i beat mittens
Has anyone ever beat the "Maximum" 3200 bot?
Sort:
Dec 10, 2023
0
#203
I accidentally beat the Maximum bot once. I think it was broken because it was super easy even though I had a low rating at the time.
I crushed him with nextchessmove.com’s engine. I definitely recommend you visit that website! It has stock fish 16 and it can detect brilliant moves!
i've beaten the 3200 computer plenty of times 
Dec 27, 2023
0
#206
I am pretty sure if an engine played another engine, it would be a draw unless one engine is vastly superior than the other...
I’ve never tried but I wonder what mittens true Elo is? Maybe above 3200 or below?
Wait... what if you put Maximum against Maximum??
Probably a draw
Is it even possible?
I don't think so
Magnus And Fabi Can Beat It i think so
Dec 27, 2023
0
#213
Kim-Anh1 a écrit :
Is it even possible?
I really did it once so yes. And it seems other people did it too.
Yes I have defeat it many times it very easy u duffer's
Now you all cry. Cry scene please
Dec 28, 2023
0
#216
You said if anyone has ever beat[en] the "Maximum" 3200 bot... Yes I did!
You might say that this is from a custom position but you forgot to precise... 
Yes. It is extremly difficult.
Yessssssss
Yes I have beaten up
I am rated 1600 on chess.com. I can beat a 2100 komodo almost everytime. But I know a 3200 engine and a 2100 engine are completely 2 diffferent stories. Even 2500rated komodo crushes me EVERY SINGLE GAME. Engines rated above 2000 are just starting to play weird and dangerous moves that normal players dont see. Like the engine just plays a weird and pointless move at first, but then the next move their piece just lands on a very dangerous square for u.
I think it is more like you have a way of looking at the board that is objectively flawed, I think everyone does even magnus. But very few people could prove that with magnus. The computer is making a move for a reason, and its much more likely that this "pointless" move that somehow enables alot isn't just a stand off thing. That "pointless" move could have a very simple reason that you are just overlooking. I find this to be common in particular when the move you made a inaccuracy or mistake on isn't the move (in some cases moves) you did wrong, it was somewhere in the past you played a subtle idea that was wrong that is only now showing up in the present. This is the most common way I see players getting confused.