Has anyone ever beat the "Maximum" 3200 bot?

I mean, the 3200 hung a queen hahaha
That should be impossible, what might have happened, and this already happened to me in the chess.com website. Is that when you click to play on a certain bot, it sometimes doesn't pair you up against it, like it doesn't play to its rating. And no, no 3200 bot would hang their queen. So sorry friend , it didn't play even close to 3200, like remotely close to that.

Oh, yeah I thought so too

I've beaten it using the king's pawn opening. How I beat it engine 3200

Yes

I managed to put the rank #3200 in check 6-7 moves in... after that I was in survival mode 😂

[Event "Vs. Computer"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2023-02-18"]
[White "Username733"]
[Black "Maximum"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Termination "Maximum won by checkmate"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 Nbd7 7. f3 e6 8. Bc4
Qc7 9. Qe2 h6 10. Bh4 b5 11. Bd3 Be7 12. O-O O-O 13. f4 Bb7 14. Bf2 Nc5 15. Nb3
b4 16. Nxc5 dxc5 17. e5 bxc3 18. exf6 Bxf6 19. bxc3 Bxc3 20. Rad1 Rfd8 21. Be4
Bxe4 22. Qxe4 Bd4 23. Bxd4 cxd4 24. Rxd4 Rxd4 25. Qxa8+ Kh7 26. Qxa6 Qxc2 27.
Qa7 Rd2 28. Rf2 Qb1+ 29. Rf1 Qe4 30. Rf2 Qb1+ 31. Rf1 Qe4 32. Rf2 Qe1+ 33. Rf1
Qe2 34. Qf2 Qd3 35. Qf3 Qd4+ 36. Rf2 Rd1+ 37. Qxd1 Qxd1+ 38. Rf1 Qd4+ 39. Rf2
Qa1+ 40. Rf1 Qxa2 41. h3 Qd5 42. Rf3 Kg6 43. Rg3+ Kf5 44. Kh1 g6 45. Kh2 Kxf4
46. Ra3 e5 47. Ra4+ e4 48. Rb4 f5 49. h4 Qd3 50. Ra4 Qg3+ 51. Kg1 Qe1+ 52. Kh2
Qxh4+ 53. Kg1 Qe1+ 54. Kh2 g5 55. g3+ Qxg3+ 56. Kh1 Qf3+ 57. Kh2 Qe2+ 58. Kh1
Qd1+ 59. Kg2 Qxa4 60. Kh3 Kf3 61. Kh2 Qc2+ 62. Kh3 Qg2# 0-1

Nah I tried it and lost after 62 moves

Git gud

I'm afraid not.

i could easily lol

Yea I just beat it no engine but I tricked it to hang its queen. broken mechanic. don't know how to share the game. 

liar i checked your profile

Those who say they did must prove it.

If not liars. 3200 ELO is above all world champions.

Maths and chess are logical, 3200 is unbeatable. bots at this level don't make any mistake even the slightest.

how many accounts have you gone through at this point

You are confusing basic facts, you just don't know what you are talking about.

3200 on chess.com is not equal to 3200 FIDE, not even close. On chess.com, there are humans who have 3200+. Just look at the blitz and bullet leaderboard.

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/live

For an engine, 3200 on chess.com is absolutely pathetic. Just because it is called "Maximum bot" it does not mean that it is good.

Just to correct some things, first no, it isn't chess.com ratings, but based yes on FIDE ratings, this can easily be proven by the ELO on the impersonification of the players like hikaru, levy, and any other player that have chess com ratings way above their fide ratings, and yes they are somewhat precise because you can check their videos playing against themselves and it usually is pretty even.
Second, yes it is that good, you can check GMs playing it, and if it was 3200 chess com ratings, some of them would be able to beat it easily or at least not lose 15 times before getting a win. The thing is, chess.com sometimes bugs when you choose a certain bot to play against, and you get paired against a way different bot than what you think you are playing, so if someone here played the 3200 bot and it hung a piece, you should refresh and restart the game, because no 3200 engine would easily hang anything. To give even a bigger example, Magnus Carlsen has a single game against it with 96+ accuracy which was a draw... so...

Third, this one I am 90% certain, the ratings are based on rapid ratings, and because you don't have a time limit, you can beat much higher ELO bots, because it is playing on an accuracy more close to rapid, there are some GMs that have videos beating and sweating to beat the 3200 bot, but they took much more time than a rapid game would allow.

Fourth, but last, it is still a machine, it might repeat a bunch of openings and middle game moves, which means that replaying the same engine over and over again, might give you an edge you wouldn't have against humans.