artfizz wrote:
wormrose wrote: I'm a grumpy old man and I refuse to recognize anything.
Wormrose GoM - impressive!
Is It Just Me?
Sort:
Phssthpok wrote:
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you
exactly.
Feb 4, 2011
0
#44
tweet - tweet - on twitter you tweet. So, she tweeted. 
Some people twaddle on Twitter. Palin, for instance.
Those that twaddle in their tweets on twitter are twits.
JG27Pyth wrote:
@Schachgeek (did I get that right, this is your writing isn't it:) I had a spat with Facebook a while back because they were allowing a convicted murder to contact my minor children. I asked Facebook for admin rights to my kids' profiles. Facebook's response was that these kids (12,13 and 15) have privacy rights that trump parental rights.
As a former reporter, I can tell you I'd be drooling to write this up. And it falls on a lot of beats: tech, family, law/rights.
An organization like Facebook is sensitive to its public profile -- they may become a lot more responsive to you if you get some media coverage of your story. And your story really does seem newsworthy to me.
One reporter to another, you know there's more to the story than that. Even in the next paragraph he admitted it was more complicated than the quoted portion made it sound.
Well, you have to bear in mind that the original comment was from a confirmed chronic liar and cheat.
Didn't the Monarchists win last time around over there?