oh i am trying for 3x3 but just cant solve it
Is there anyone who likes to play chess and also likes to play Rubik's Cube?
Sort:
solve it myself bcz why does it matter for watching videos
it is English
Jul 15, 2024
0
#86
long_quach wrote:
Dachesvibe wrote:
solve it myself bcz why does it matter for watching videos
I have no idea what you mean.
Try again.
@long_quach:
You realize this is a chess.com forum in 2024, not some formal debate club in the 1970s.
mee
my pfp explains it
Jul 15, 2024
0
#91
@long_quach We are not pointing you, we are just trying to understand WHAT THE [BLEEP] ARE YOU TRYING TO TELL US ABOUT SOLVING THE RUBIK'S CUBE BY YOURSELF IS GOOD AND WHY ARE YOU SO SRUBBRON ABOUT THIS IDEA
@long_quach You are right, it would be 100x more interesting to solve the cube alone. I never thought of this when I was learning it, everyone was just saying that I had to learn it with a tutorial. Now, it would be challenging to learn it by myself, but I cannot, as I already know the algorithms. What is the point in learning the algorithm to solve the cube? To flex? As a memory exercise?
Jul 15, 2024
0
#95
long_quach wrote:
Dachesvibe wrote:
solve it myself bcz why does it matter for watching videos
Maybe English is not your native language, maybe it is French.
Try to articulate yourself better.
And don't use "young in" words like "bcz" for "because".
Try to "speak" slowly and clearly.
you know just because you like to speak "proper" english so you can pretend you are smart doesnt mean the rest of us have to speak like 80 year old lawyers. this is 2024, not 1970
Jul 15, 2024
0
#96
chekagain wrote:
long_quach wrote:
Dachesvibe wrote:
solve it myself bcz why does it matter for watching videos
Maybe English is not your native language, maybe it is French.
Try to articulate yourself better.
And don't use "young in" words like "bcz" for "because".
Try to "speak" slowly and clearly.
you know just because you like to speak "proper" english so you can pretend you are smart doesnt mean the rest of us have to speak like 80 year old lawyers. this is 2024, not 1970
rephrasing what i said but ok
long_quach ha scritto:
qualcuno6800654 wrote:
@long_quach You are right, it would be 100x more interesting to solve the cube alone. I never thought of this when I was learning it, everyone was just saying that I had to learn it with a tutorial. Now, it would be challenging to learn it by myself, but I cannot, as I already know the algorithms. What is the point in learning the algorithm to solve the cube? To flex? As a memory exercise?
Again. How many of you can understand the question, let a lone the answer.
You almost have it.
I would be 100x more interesting to solve the cube alone.
Your language is even wrong.
There is no such thing as to "learn" it by yourself.
To solve it yourself means you are your own teacher.
Your mind cannot conceive of "there is no teacher".
Yessir. That is what I said
Jul 15, 2024
0
#98
Dachesvibe wrote:
oh i am trying for 3x3 but just cant solve it
It's hard. I have one. I'm rlly bad at it.
Jul 15, 2024
0
#99
long_quach wrote:
long_quach wrote:
It is genius beyond us to come up with the Fahrenheit system.
Fahrenheit could've learned the Celsius system.
Then his mind would be stuck in the Celsius system.
Or he also thought of the Celsius system, but he has a better idea.
If he is like most of most of us, we would not have the Fahrenheit system.
Your point?
me