Posting of girly photos on chess.com

Sort:
macer75
rmurray wrote:
landwehr wrote:
pt22064 wrote:

Am I the only one to find it odd that landwehr complains about photos of adolescent girls but not those of adolescent boys? My beef is with unattractive people posting their photos. ;-)

Good news, photos are going ...both girls and boys!

You are not alone.         ....very odd.     great word..."odd".  

That's why I don't post my photo (part of the reason why, at least), and use this avatar instead.

BigDoggProblem
fartinghorse wrote:

I'd like to check mate her

But you'll settle for a selfmate, yes? :P

sapientdust
BorgQueen wrote:

All the things I know that were reported to chess.com staff and they said they'd get it done and then nothing happens and nothing said... must all be in the next upgrade.  I hope so anyway.

Keep dreaming! They've made it abundantly clear that they value adding new features much more than fixing non-critical bugs or improving existing half-baked features.

nameno1had

madhacker wrote:

You honestly think most of them are really girls?

i both shudder and snicker at the thought ....

landwehr
BorgQueen wrote:

I don't find them in conflict.  The things I am thinking about are new features to enrich what already exists or to implement new features... not fix non-critical bugs etc.

Would like to hear your ideas to improve features on chess.com

landwehr
rmurray wrote:
landwehr wrote:
pt22064 wrote:

Am I the only one to find it odd that landwehr complains about photos of adolescent girls but not those of adolescent boys? My beef is with unattractive people posting their photos. ;-)

Good news, photos are going ...both girls and boys!

You are not alone.         ....very odd.     great word..."odd".  

Where did you find your avatar? 

rumjunky8
BigDoggProblem wrote:
fartinghorse wrote:

I'd like to check mate her

But you'll settle for a selfmate, yes? :P

mostly likely I'd end up bashing the bishop  :P

Blkau

Why are gals given chances for men to comments and making jokes on their bare pic : ( Where has their pride gone??

macer75
macer75 wrote:
fartinghorse wrote:

I'd like to check mate her

Who is that girl? She is soooooo hot!

Can someone plz answer my question (picture on 4th page, last post)? I'm very desperate to know! lol

Blkau
[COMMENT DELETED]
Blkau
landwehr wrote:

Adolescent girls join chess.com free of charge, play no chess, but post dozens of snaps of themselves in silly poses. In one day their pics have hundreds of views, I imagine men the culprits.

Some get a few pathetic comments that are very exagerated at times. These girls are abusing the photo feature on chess.com.

The rule should be you can post pics after completing a given number of games.

Would not say men are the cuoprit, if they do not respect themself, who the hell would respect them! The silly comments and jokes are supposed to serve them well.

landwehr
rmurray wrote:
landwehr wrote:
rmurray wrote:
landwehr wrote:
pt22064 wrote:

Am I the only one to find it odd that landwehr complains about photos of adolescent girls but not those of adolescent boys? My beef is with unattractive people posting their photos. ;-)

Good news, photos are going ...both girls and boys!

You are not alone.         ....very odd.     great word..."odd".  

Where did you find your avatar? 

Your new name.   "Mr. Odd".   I already told you mr. odd,  ......the last time you were blabbing on about some grand notion or another, and i called you a "Grand Windbag".     You are a forgetful, odd, grand windbag with too much nothing to do, but sit on your ass, and .......hey, wait a minute.....what's happening.........

Oh....I have to go deal with the real world..... I'll check back in a few years, and there you'll be.....King Grand Windbag Champion of chess.com. .......the guy who posted the most, and said the least.   

Thanks for paying all that attention to my posts. You obviously enjoy reading what I say. Keep following my posts with your comments. Perhaps you should check on 'reflectivist' posts and award him your prize for being the person who posted the most and said the least. You are very fortunate because I will continue to feed your obsession with my windbagging.

zborg

Nah.  You're just so happy to have a thread with more than 10 posts, @Landywear.

More power to you.  Laughing

landwehr
zborg wrote:

Nah.  You're just so happy to have a thread with more than 10 posts, @Landywear.

More power to you. 

At least my fan club has two loyal members zborg and rmurray. Unfortunately zborg just seems to critcise others and not make his own posts that could attract a little attention. Let me know where your supporters hang out and I will stay clear of that troll's cave.

RichColorado

Are these the girly photos you are talking about? Some look like chess players to me.

http://www.chess.com/blog/GAMEOVERFORU2/the-300

876543Z1

Well the title is enough to draw many in, including myself sadly.

If folks review the drop down menu More/Photos/Me etc etc etc I'm sure they will realise there is an issue to address.

>:)

Knightly_News
zborg wrote:

Nah.  You're just so happy to have a thread with more than 10 posts, @Landywear.

More power to you. 

Second thread you're trying to derail or getting into name calling and trashing other people's handle in this forum in an hour.  You're really on a roll.  I don't know why the moderator is punishing others for lesser offenses and letting you persist and your posts stand.  And not unsurprisingly, you are in the Royal Spam Society chess.com group clique that seems to do this kind of thing and get away with it.

landwehr
reflectivist wrote:
zborg wrote:

Nah.  You're just so happy to have a thread with more than 10 posts, @Landywear.

More power to you. 

Second thread you're trying to derail or getting into name calling and trashing other people's handle in this forum in an hour.  You're really on a roll.  I don't know why the moderator is punishing others for lesser offenses and letting you persist and your posts stand.  And not unsurprisingly, you are in the Royal Spam Society chess.com group clique that seems to do this kind of thing and get away with it.

Thanks reflectivist for confirming what I thought about zborg also.

AlCzervik

Geez, give it a rest, reflector. You block half the site and then spew your puke at many of these same people in other threads.

Knightly_News
AlCzervik wrote:

Geez, give it a rest, reflector. You block half the site and then spew your puke at many of these same people in other threads.

Hardly half the site, only a handful (8 or 9 of you RSS, e.g. Royal Spam Society chess.com group, tag team) who harrass me and others and then whine like you're some kind of victims, incessantly about me blocking you.  Why wouldn't I block you and why would I care, and what would you expect when you guys 'playfully' bully anyone you want to, fast and loose style, and seem to get away with it where others don't.  I saw an account just disappear the other day right after challenging one of your group's members in a thread, and other seeming actions of moderator favoritism to your clique's wishes/demands, etc...  Don't know what that was all about.  And the only reason I replied to zborg here was he just recently insulted me and derailed the 'circle' thread out of the blue, unprovoked, and I believe the moderator has still left it standing after heavily chastizing me for something similar or more tame a couple of days ago.  I'm just wondering where the professionalism, fair play, and justice regarding the TOS is.  I am not looking for trouble.  I'm just tired of your gang harrassing people with impunity and I'm not standing by and shutting up for it, or giving you access to more of my threads to harrass me anymore.  So at least about the blocking, quit whining.  It's a legitimate option and I'm using it.  I'm sorry if you bullies are really whining wimps underneath it all, but that's not unprecedented for bullies.

This forum topic has been locked