The claim that's being contested is not whether the rule had been updated.
RIP GChess
Sort:
May 20, 2021
0
#83
royalknight101 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
royalknight101 wrote:
yeah pretty bad timing which is ironic
How's it ironic?
its ironic since on that day many people were allowed to say lichess now and gleason said it was updated but that it was "possible" GC didnt know as he was told to stop me. however its this updated rule which technically killed him at the end as he broke the rules and muted a person for saying something legal
Oh. You made it sound like the bad timing was ironic.
May 20, 2021
0
#84
royalknight101 wrote:
GChess violated the rules even thou his manager told him to do it
Ok... so now the claim of yours that I find most ridiculous is that GChess was demoted for doing something his managed told him to do.
If his manager needed to create false pretenses to demote GChess, then his manager would keep this a secret from his boss(es) at chess.com... which means it would also be a secret from you (lol)
If his manager didn't need to create false pretenses, and did it just to make GChess look bad... it again means you wouldn't know about it (lol again).
He was a really nice mod. I remember, once, I had posted a comment on another forum and the OP had deleted his first comment so he offered to delete the forum.
May 20, 2021
0
#86
royalknight101 wrote:
it ties to the point that GChess was demoted cause as gleason explained, he most likey didnt see the updated rule even before i was muted as it was before any of this happened last week. gleason confirms also that staff has decided to relax on the rule itself but obviously GChess just didnt notice the change and thought he was doing the right thing to not get fired. however his manager probably also didnt notice as in the next few days after i gave my essay to support, he was demoted. isnt that ironic? the timing, new rule, and how both most likely didnt notice it which lead to him being demoted?
You're just wasting my time now.
May 20, 2021
0
#87
llama47 wrote:
royalknight101 wrote:
GChess violated the rules even thou his manager told him to do it
Ok... so now the claim of yours that I find most ridiculous is that GChess was demoted for doing something his managed told him to do.
If his manager needed to create false pretenses to demote GChess, then his manager would keep this a secret from his boss(es) at chess.com... which means it would also be a secret from you (lol)
If his manager didn't need to create false pretenses, and did it just to make GChess look bad... it again means you wouldn't know about it (lol again).
Let it be. You don't need to study for fallacies in every sentence, just like I shouldn't find every grammar mistake and correct it.
I admit, he's not writing it well, but this is pointless.
May 20, 2021
0
#88
royalknight101 wrote:
do you get my point or not?
I understand that you're either acting dumb, or it's not an act.
Either way it's a waste of my time.
May 20, 2021
0
#89
JackRoach wrote:
llama47 wrote:
royalknight101 wrote:
GChess violated the rules even thou his manager told him to do it
Ok... so now the claim of yours that I find most ridiculous is that GChess was demoted for doing something his managed told him to do.
If his manager needed to create false pretenses to demote GChess, then his manager would keep this a secret from his boss(es) at chess.com... which means it would also be a secret from you (lol)
If his manager didn't need to create false pretenses, and did it just to make GChess look bad... it again means you wouldn't know about it (lol again).
Let it be. You don't need to study for fallacies in every sentence, just like I shouldn't find every grammar mistake and correct it.
I admit, he's not writing it well, but this is pointless.
Yeah.
May 20, 2021
0
#90
My impression of @royalknight101 is that he's not dumb, he's just trolling.
If I were the OP I'd block him.
Just saying.
May 20, 2021
0
#91
llama47 wrote:
My impression of @royalknight101 is that he's not dumb, he's just trolling.
If I were the OP I'd block him.
Just saying.
I disagree.
May 20, 2021
0
#92
royalknight101 wrote:
this was from his last moments and i felt bad as idk what really happened but me and gleason along with other evidence leads to the conclusion that he just got demoted by accidentally breaking a rule which is hard to see
Ok, now I see where you're coming from... I still disagree, but I wont make fun of you for it anymore.
By the way, people aren't demoted for making honest mistakes... there's a lot to this story we're not hearing... but that's not the point of this topic. The point (or at least what I'd like the topic to be) is that we like GChess, he's a good person, and we're sorry to see him go.
May 20, 2021
0
#93
shanlee132 wrote:
No offense but I don't even know who he is.
He was a moderator on chess.com. He was also a very nice person
May 20, 2021
0
#94
Mathperson2015 wrote:
shanlee132 wrote:
No offense but I don't even know who he is.
He was a moderator on chess.com. He was also a very nice person
Indeed.
May 21, 2021
0
#96
Guys just to put a final pin in this we all appreciate very much the work GChess put in to chess.com. Chess.com does not just remove moderators for no reason and not for making a simple mistake as one member keeps mentioning in this thread. Please realise that only chess.com know the real reasons and speculating does not help at all. We thank GChess for all the hard work he has put in and wish him all the best with his future endeavours. KB
May 21, 2021
0
#97
My complaint is not about someone is demoted from the mod role but about the
HOW it was done:
No information about the reason to that person
No chance to explain himself
No diagloue or clarifying conversation upfront
In my eyes a very unfair treatment which causes the self closure of the account.
May 21, 2021
0
#98
I didn't see this until now :/
Really unfortunate, I liked @gchess's moderation over many other mods.
I guess chess.com has its reasons though. We might never know the details, but anyway it's sad to see you go @gchess 
NobleElevator wrote:
I didn't see this until now :/
Really unfortunate, I liked @gchess's moderation over many other mods.
I guess chess.com has its reasons though. We might never know the details, but anyway it's sad to see you go @gchess
see? the mod violated something which was legal by muting me so it is highly possible
Now we're back to "highly possible" which is of course further supported by your made up "they've fired staff for similar things in the past."