Tally: Forum Annoyances II

Sort:
TheGrobe

Relax?  That's rich coming from the one who's come out swinging for no apparent reason.

thegab03
TheGrobe wrote:
thegab03 wrote:

you brought his name into the forum, when it was not necessary, you could have avoided that, but no, you didn't.

I for ex.... say, Reb is a cheat, a usless person that I wish to avoid & never hear nothing about.

how you class that bro? yo!


 What are you claiming that I said about him that is bad ?.  I think you'll find Reb has a rather easy time backing up the fact that he's got a block in place -- you're mock accusation is of a different nature altogether.  I think it's quite a stretch to construe naming someone you've blocked as abuse, but an accusation of cheating (mock or otherwise) quite clearly is.

Oh, and as for pidgin English (from the post I quoted above), I actually thought it was a fairly accurate characterization of your posting style.

Still do.


  I think you'll find Reb has a rather easy time backing up the fact that he's got a block in place =  a very big head, yo

you're mock accusation is of a different nature altogether - if you say so, but who are you to preach? yo!

you're mock accusation is of a different nature altogether - intended to be so, when treated like sh@te......what goes around comes around...yo!

Oh, and as for pidgin English (from the post I quoted above), I actually thought it was a fairly accurate characterization of your posting style.

Still do.

- Holy Mary Mother of Jeasus, that boy is coming around, give him another tab, yo!

TheGrobe

Actually, I'm not sure that damages are a prerequisite for a written statement to libel (or an oral one slander) -- the only reason they're a consideration is because a plaintiff is typically looking to be awarded damages from the defendant when such a case is heard in court.

I could be wrong, though.

thegab03

man I try to expain my self, t'is a better that I stick to Gabanese, yous are all trying to be a smart talkers, wait, I better check with me lawer first, don't be a loosin' any a sleep now, yas TULIPS, yo!

artfizz

Ideally, this topic was trying merely to list forum annoyances - not cause them and demonstrate them.

#40. Referring to another chess.com member in a disparaging way.

mcash2183

for defamation of character either oral or written it has to cause a person or business to appear in some sort of negative fashion because of the oral or written lie.  the easiest defense is obviously the truth and the second is a matter of opinion  "is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image. It is usually, but not always,[1] a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed"  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation)

artfizz

Although there was mention of slander, libel and defamation, it's more insidious just to make a slightly knocking remark about someone else at chess.com - particularly about one of the well-known personalities. Before you know it, a few more people have agreed, some others have disagreed - and it soon descends into a fully-fledged slanging match.

dommo

i'm a pussycat,,,,,,,,agreed

Loomis
artfizz wrote:

Ideally, this topic was trying merely to list forum annoyances - not cause them and demonstrate them.

#40. Referring to another chess.com member in a disparaging way.


This is one of the rules of the internet. Given the opportunity to be annoying, someone will take it.

This makes it impossible to create a list of forum annoyances without at least a few of them being demonstrated.

artfizz
artfizz wrote:

Ideally, this topic was trying merely to list forum annoyances - not cause them and demonstrate them.

#40. Referring to another chess.com member in a disparaging way.


Loomis wrote: This is one of the rules of the internet. Given the opportunity to be annoying, someone will take it.

This makes it impossible to create a list of forum annoyances without at least a few of them being demonstrated.


 Why would you say a thing like that? (Wink)

bigpoison

Very, very strange tangent this thread has taken.  Sorta' reminds me of a watered down version of the drdoc meltdown.

goldendog
bigpoison wrote:

Very, very strange tangent this thread has taken.  Sorta' reminds me of a watered down version of the drdoc meltdown.


For me it was like an exploding clown car. Ridiculous and tragic.

artfizz
bigpoison wrote: Very, very strange tangent this thread has taken.  Sorta' reminds me of a watered down version of the drdoc meltdown.

goldendog wrote: For me it was like an exploding clown car. Ridiculous and tragic.


There's a fine line between loving the site, loathing it and leaving it.

TheGrobe
goldendog wrote:
bigpoison wrote:

Very, very strange tangent this thread has taken.  Sorta' reminds me of a watered down version of the drdoc meltdown.


For me it was like an exploding clown car. Ridiculous and tragic.


Plus it just... wouldn't... stop.

kco

hmm is looked like you have done your homework Anthony

DPenn
artfizz wrote:
bigpoison wrote: Very, very strange tangent this thread has taken.  Sorta' reminds me of a watered down version of the drdoc meltdown.

goldendog wrote: For me it was like an exploding clown car. Ridiculous and tragic.


There's a fine line between loving the site, loathing it and leaving it.


 ...kind of like a marriage...

artfizz

Could I request all concerned to take their argument out of this topic please? It's beginning to get annoying.

 

Erik wrote: Chess.com is a friendly community. We try to keep it that way by following a common set of rules for posting. The following topics are not allowed in the main public forums or chat rooms:

  • offensive/vulgar language
  • personal attacks
  • ...
trysts
artfizz wrote:

Could I request all concerned to take their argument out of this topic please? It's beginning to get annoying.

 

Erik wrote: Chess.com is a friendly community. We try to keep it that way by following a common set of rules for posting. The following topics are not allowed in the main public forums or chat rooms:

offensive/vulgar language personal attacks ...

Hilarious! An entire topic which makes you think of forum annoyances really deserves what it gotLaughing

thegab03
AnthonyCG wrote:
thegab03 wrote:
AnthonyCG wrote:
thegab03 wrote:
Reb wrote:
AnthonyCG wrote:
Reb wrote:
kco wrote:

like, chess trainor for example ?


 Yes !  Exactly !  I NEVER check his forums nor any of his posts anymore.....


He's still here!??


 I dont know if he's still here but if he is I simply ignore him, only two have earned my ignoring them completely..... the other is that awardchess character..... sheeesh !  They should be stuck in a forum together ! 


NM Reb, ya cheeky fecker " the other is that awardchess character " you is a grand man for stirrin' ze a sh@te , where the feck you got your a NM???? No Motivation ???, t'is way too easy to speak of others, whilst they can't defend themselfs, yo!

The other as you a say, like he is a leper, is my good friend AWARDCHESS, Greg as you bloody well a know is no fool not like some NM Reb , that thinks he's still in the far west, guns a blaring & all that a crap, look in ze mirror, if it supports a ya, ya freakin' a tulip, yo! 


What the heck are you saying? Speak english yo...

Awardchess spammed the forums with all his bragging about winning and other randomness long before he ever disapperared. Friend or no that is a proven fact that you cannot prove otherwise. There is nothing to defend because it is well known that he has attributed to much spam on the site a la his insane member point count. I don't have a problem with the guy but facts are facts. No need to attack someone that has actually contributed to the site.

Save your misplaced hero act for someone that deserves it and do your homework before going off at the mouth.

Of course we can take a trip to his old threads if you need further proof. I unlike you can back my claims and have no problem doing so if necessary.

 


What the heck are you saying? Speak english yo...

If ya don't understand, you're either thick or you landed on your head at birth, ( ps. try a translator ) yo!

Awardchess spammed the forums with all his bragging about winning and other randomness long before he ever disapperared

If so, why drag the person that is not here, his face in the mud for others to gloat on, let's not forget, you is speaking past tense, but still, what ever turns you a on, yo!

 Friend or no that is a proven fact that you cannot prove otherwise.

Please, leave your ignorance at home, I've nothing to prove to you or no other fecker that hides behind an NM!

No need to attack someone that has actually contributed to the site.

No reason for a SO CALLED RESPECTABLE MEMBER, to openingly attack another member on this site nor in this forum where the person in question has not posted nought, yo!

Save your misplaced hero act for someone that deserves it and do your homework before going off at the mouth.

Screw you bro, I don't bend before threats, & hero act? that's a new one, did you invent that, or is it because you is alone infront of your pc WHILST YOUR BOYFRIEND'S SCREWING BEHIND YOUR A BACK, yo

Of course we can take a trip to his old threads if you need further proof. I unlike you can back my claims and have no problem doing so if necessary

Go for it bro, for I record all, I'll take you up on that, yo, I is finnished with a you, yo!


Dude it's not 1989. No one says yo anymore...

No reason for a SO CALLED RESPECTABLE MEMBER, to openingly attack another member on this site nor in this forum where the person in question has not posted nought, yo!

I'm not attacking - only stating facts that have occured. If I spammed I'd expect to be called out too.

Screw you bro, I don't bend before threats, & hero act? that's a new one, did you invent that, or is it because you is alone infront of your pc WHILST YOUR BOYFRIEND'S SCREWING BEHIND YOUR A BACK, yo

It is medling in things you obviously can't comprehend. It's not a threat genius. You're saving someone that doesen't need saving... dur... How could you see that as a threat? Seriously? Man... But hey, if I couldn't type a sentence without saying yo I might jump to insults too... nah...

Go for it bro, for I record all, I'll take you up on that, yo, I is finnished with a you, yo!

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/won-3000-games-at-wwwchesscom?page=1 "The thread is fine until he starts spamming random stats sheets everywhere."

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/aniko-stay-cool "This crap got locked."


http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/i-got-a-diamond-membership-at-wwwchesscom-i-go-to-ebay-nowi "Spamtastic"

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/fun-with-chess/your-best-play-chess-time-when-all-of-your-cats-and-kitties-are-sleeping-isnt-it "Read if you want lol."

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-organizers/fast-chess-team "Hmmm...."

Anyway you will notice that currently he only posts articles because of all the backlash from spamming the forums. I don't think I even saw half of all that content on his page. Maybe over 100 pages worth... Again I'm only stating facts. I got no problem with the guy but the writing is on the wall.

You want more or are we done here yo?





AnthonyCG , that's your " so called " heavy stuff there? listen bro, if you want, I'll send you by message a wee sample of what you probally never seen & maybe you might understand my frustration, for I ain't gonna print it here for all to gloat on, hence why I try to defend my friend for being openly picked on, regardless of the past, you know bro, he don't post in these forums any more!

So why are people dragging his name in the mud, like he never existed? sorry but I can't except that, if you want a sample, send me a message & I shall gladly show you, live & let live, yo!

TheGrobe

Please, by message would be good.