What Characterizes a Normal Chess.com Thread?

Sort:
zborg

Short pithy sentences, masquerading as deep thoughts.

Along with many wasted keystrokes, as per the Brainiac post above.

Ubik42
zborg wrote:

Short pithy sentences, masquerading as deep thoughts.

Along with many wasted keystrokes, as per the Brainiac post above.

A deep thought is just a phrase.

FonzMcBride

If it is related to chess in any way it is not normal

TheGrobe
Ubik42 wrote:
zborg wrote:

Short pithy sentences, masquerading as deep thoughts.

Along with many wasted keystrokes, as per the Brainiac post above.

A deep thought is just a phrase.

And the men and women merely players.

chessdex
FonzMcBride wrote:

If it is related to chess in any way it is not normal

excellent description!

Ubik42
TheGrobe wrote:
Ubik42 wrote:
zborg wrote:

Short pithy sentences, masquerading as deep thoughts.

Along with many wasted keystrokes, as per the Brainiac post above.

A deep thought is just a phrase.

And the men and women merely players.

And the computers only play bit parts.

Ben_Dubuque
Ubik42 wrote:
TheGrobe wrote:
Ubik42 wrote:
zborg wrote:

Short pithy sentences, masquerading as deep thoughts.

Along with many wasted keystrokes, as per the Brainiac post above.

A deep thought is just a phrase.

And the men and women merely players.

And the computers only play bit parts.

and daeth runs the show

CP6033

well, If it is boring it doesn't include macer, but if it is trolling and it doesn't include macer all i have to say is what is the world coming too? but yeah there are several ones, 

A Fighting!!!!!!

B Trolling 

C uneducated 

D bad speeling

lots of other stupid things/

chessdex

There is at least one very unreasonable person in a thread who doesn't agree with anyone

FonzMcBride

chessdex wrote:

There is at least one very unreasonable person in a thread who doesn't agree with anyone

That is complete bollocks!

chessdex
FonzMcBride wrote:

chessdex wrote:

There is at least one very unreasonable person in a thread who doesn't agree with anyone

That is complete bollocks!

So I guess you will be that person in this thread. Wink

Ubik42

Also a thread includes relvant pics, like this preview of the upcoming new Xmen film:

 

varelse1
chessdex wrote:

There is at least one very unreasonable person in a thread who doesn't agree with anyone

Yes.

And should you ever agree with that person, they will literally change their mind, simply to have an arguement.

(Much like several women I have dated in the past.)

EDB123

much like me. I actually have fun being the argumentative guy in a thread, but I use evidence to disprove any argument you can think of.

Ubik42
EDB123 wrote:

much like me. I actually have fun being the argumentative guy in a thread, but I use evidence to disprove any argument you can think of.

I need evidence for this claim.

EDB123
Ubik42 wrote:
EDB123 wrote:

much like me. I actually have fun being the argumentative guy in a thread, but I use evidence to disprove any argument you can think of.

I need evidence for this claim.

are you a lawyer, or some guy pretending to be one?

Soorat92

characteristics of a normal chess.com thread?

1). It'll wander off topic fast

2). It'll be "trolled" by people who think they are funnier than they actually are - (i'll include myself in here - although i only ever post because my response amuses me - if anyone else finds something i post is funny to them then, i assure you that's purely by chance)

3). The only people who'll post more comments than the would-be trolls are the people complaining about the would-be trolls

4). Macer will try to tell us that's he's the world's best troll - or he'll tell us he is the best troll on here today and then mention people like daeth

5). just when somebody finally posts something that makes the thread interesting it'll be locked or deleted

macer75
Soorat92 wrote:

characteristics of a normal chess.com thread?

1). It'll wander off topic fast

2). It'll be "trolled" by people who think they are funnier than they actually are - (i'll include myself in here - although i only ever post because my response amuses me - if anyone else finds something i post is funny to them then, i assure you that's purely by chance)

3). The only people who'll post more comments than the would-be trolls are the people complaining about the would-be trolls

4). Macer will try to tell us that's he's the world's best troll - or he'll tell us he is the best troll on here today and then mention people like daeth

5). just when somebody finally posts something that makes the thread interesting it'll be locked or deleted

Amen. You can't say it better than that. Looks like at least on this thread, I won't be able to make the claim that I'm the best.

Ubik42
EDB123 wrote:
Ubik42 wrote:
EDB123 wrote:

much like me. I actually have fun being the argumentative guy in a thread, but I use evidence to disprove any argument you can think of.

I need evidence for this claim.

are you a lawyer, or some guy pretending to be one?

Are you prepared to tell me that you have evidence for every argument except for the argument that you have evidence for every argument?

MrDamonSmith

This one is pretty normal.