PeshkaCh, I like his streams full of innocence and love for Chess game. And love it of course when I see some 7 y.o. prodidgy beat some X.M. in bullet games (He has turned 8 now).
Who is your favorite chess.com player other than yourself


I don't think a kid that young should be streaming. This world is getting crazy.
As for the topic, I guess my favourite chess.com player is the duck.

I don't think a kid that young should be streaming. This world is getting crazy.
As for the topic, I guess my favourite chess.com player is the duck.
You just proved your own statement
Do I have to pretend yours makes sense?

Rychess : "You just proved your own statement"
Argo : "I don't think a kid that young should be streaming."
Really makes no sense to me (I may prove wrong you know but..). It's extremely good I think for children -even more if they do have a talent that may one day lead them to the top and under the lights- to learn how to talk in public situation. That's a very delicate thing most young people find difficult. These children will learn self-confidence, that's a huge gift parents made allowing the child to stream and accompany him. Anyway the child do stream under parents supervision, it's not as if PeshkaCh was left alone in the wild of the internet (thit I would really disapprove if it was your fear). So what do you really object other than that (if anything) to giving a child such a immense benefit that is the experience of public success at young age? Most of the time frustrated adults do have the same objection, that is it will raise the child's pride. Having myself observed many young benefiting from young age public success I observed that exactly the opposite thing happen. The child having had such success very early in life (be it worldwide success or in a small community) he feels the success very natural and never develop any pride about it.
It has been centuries that old fusty people always try to object against younger people being allowed to do any and each and every possible thing. Few decades ago you had to be 21 to even decide anything in life. And already it was too young (maybe Tory was an old name for Troll? According to words strange propinquity, probably same old Sanskrit root is there). Fortunately now young people can play chess early and are considered real human people with rights and so. Not retard entities that should only shut up and listen to elder's constipated beliefs until it's too late for any change as they have themselves turned old. Not saying that there's no bad counterparts sometimes, as I underlined many times on these forums, I never believe things to be completely white or black and my opinion being automatically the best forever. Just saying that I'm (just my own feeling) happy we got rid of this kind of traditions and I have nothing against going a little further and observe, as by now, I'm overall not unsatisfied.

Rychess : "You just proved your own statement"
Argo : "I don't think a kid that young should be streaming."
Really makes no sense to me (I may prove wrong you know but..). It's extremely good I think for children -even more if they do have a talent that may one day lead them to the top and under the lights- to learn how to talk in public situation. That's a very delicate thing most young people find difficult. These children will learn self-confidence, that's a huge gift parents made allowing the child to stream and accompany him. Anyway the child do stream under parents supervision, it's not as if PeshkaCh was left alone in the wild of the internet (thit I would really disapprove if it was your fear). So what do you really object other than that (if anything) to giving a child such a immense benefit that is the experience of public success at young age? Most of the time frustrated adults do have the same objection, that is it will raise the child's pride. Having myself observed many young benefiting from young age public success I observed that exactly the opposite thing happen. The child having had such success very early in life (be it worldwide success or in a small community) he feels the success very natural and never develop any pride about it.
It has been centuries that old fusty people always try to object against younger people being allowed to do any and each and every possible thing. Few decades ago you had to be 21 to even decide anything in life. And already it was too young (maybe Tory was an old name for Troll? According to words strange propinquity, probably same old Sanskrit root is there). Fortunately now young people can play chess early and are considered real human people with rights and so. Not retard entities that should only shut up and listen to elder's constipated beliefs until it's too late for any change as they have themselves turned old. Not saying that there's no bad counterparts sometimes, as I underlined many times on these forums, I never believe things to be completely white or black and my opinion being automatically the best forever. Just saying that I'm (just my own feeling) happy we got rid of this kind of traditions and I have nothing against going a little further and observe, as by now, I'm overall not unsatisfied.
I have nothing against him playing chess, I just think kids start using the Internet too early these days.

I like David the Moderators no nonsense approach
yes, he called me homophobic once. what can i say ? i've always been straight as an arrow.
lol
Eseles is good player and very kind