1000 beating a 2600 computer in a drawn position?

Sort:
Avatar of Enderman1323

I was playing against the level 10 computer on mobile

The one with a rating of 2600.

So don't worship the chess engine, as it sometimes gets things wrong. It's incredible computing power was no match for my intuition. I played this game twice, and it did the exact same thing twice in a row. In case you're wondering, the losing move here is 10. h4... What should have been played instead is 10. hxg4, leading to a drawn position.

Avatar of Karlabos

Totally not related but how do you get to play endgames against the computer? Did you just start a new game and moved the pieces so to arrange the board in that setting? Or is there a program where you add the pieces conveniently and just start playing? If it's the latter then which program is it? And also is it free or paid?

Avatar of Enderman1323
Karlabos wrote:

Totally not related but how do you get to play endgames against the computer? Did you just start a new game and moved the pieces so to arrange the board in that setting? Or is there a program where you add the pieces conveniently and just start playing? If it's the latter then which program is it? And also is it free or paid?

The chess.com app allows you to set up your own custom positions. Even positions with No kings, pawns on the 1st rank (but not the 8th) and more than 16 pieces.

Avatar of Cherub_Enjel

Try playing the computer on an actual computer - the engine's power depends mainly on where you are playing - if you're playing on a phone, the computer will be much weaker than if you were playing on a supercomputer. 

On level 10 on my computer, the engine is as strong as Stockfish, and can routinely beat Rybka.

Avatar of AChessPlayer2016

That's because you're playing on a phone. My phone's Level 5 AI acts like a slightly weaker version of me.

Avatar of Smoggyabbainopadano

Congrats for win,u demonstered that human can beat supercomputers.

Avatar of Arisktotle
Smoggyabbainopadano wrote:

Congrats for win,u demonstered that human can beat supercomputers.

The computer was mobile at the time. It was simultaneously handling the paperwork  for a traffic accident it caused. Explains why it went in overload!

Avatar of kinglysac
Cherub_Enjel wrote:

Try playing the computer on an actual computer - the engine's power depends mainly on where you are playing - if you're playing on a phone, the computer will be much weaker than if you were playing on a supercomputer. 

On level 10 on my computer, the engine is as strong as Stockfish, and can routinely beat Rybka.

 

The chess.com engine is stockfish, at least on the analysis board.

 

Avatar of Cherub_Enjel

Stockfish is not intended to run on a phone. 

If I ran it on my broken 10 year old computer I had since I was a little kid, it would probably lag at around 9 plies or something. 

The OP played against an extremely weak computer on the phone, and that's all there is to it. 

Avatar of llama
Enderman1323 wrote:

I was playing against the level 10 computer on mobile

The one with a rating of 2600.

So don't worship the chess engine, as it sometimes gets things wrong.

The last few times my opponent showed me some analysis of an endgame on their phone (after our tournament game), I said yeah, but that's an engine on a phone in an endgame, it probably doesn't know what it's doing, I think my moves were better. tongue.png

Avatar of Enderman1323
Cherub_Enjel wrote:

Try playing the computer on an actual computer - the engine's power depends mainly on where you are playing - if you're playing on a phone, the computer will be much weaker than if you were playing on a supercomputer. 

On level 10 on my computer, the engine is as strong as Stockfish, and can routinely beat Rybka.

I pitted the engine I used on my phone against my computer several months ago (out of curiosity) and after sixty-something moves, the computer had an advantage of 0.93

Avatar of Cherub_Enjel

^Yep, I believe that's a lie.

The bottom line is, it means nothing to beat up an engine on a mobile device that's so weak it would lose the position above. You should be prouder beating a 1400 in blitz, if you ever have/do. 

Avatar of benonidoni

Maybe because that board position is not possible

Avatar of iKeemstar
benonidoni wrote:

Maybe because that board position is not possible

Wanna bet?

Avatar of Enderman1323
superman0101 wrote:

lol y u always lying.

plus, you still play minecraft?

u still read comic books?