The hardest endgame of all time

Sort:
Avatar of rychessmaster1
Im getting close but the engine is slippery

 

Avatar of rychessmaster1
I give up
Even with takebacks, this is impossible to figure out
Edit can somebody post I have 5 consecs

 

Avatar of yeetamus2002

ah here you go

and here i am, still clueless about how to do a knight and bishop mate

Avatar of rychessmaster1

thanks

Avatar of rychessmaster1

so this is as far as I got from my own but with one move of assistance I did it from here

White to play and win from here

 

Avatar of Rocky64

Nunn covered this B+N v N ending briefly in Secrets of Minor Piece Endings. He gave a few examples where the material arises from B+P v N, where the P must promote to a N in order to win. Even the simpler examples, composed by humans, are hard to understand, though Nunn provided a few pointers on the general winning method. He finished with a tablebase-generated position, which he called the most complex in the whole book, and that it's "beyond human ability to solve or check for soundness".

https://syzygy-tables.info/?fen=8/8/2P5/1n5k/5K2/8/1B6/8_w_-_-_0_1

It takes more than 50 moves to win, and the solution begins with 1.Kf5 Na7 2.c7 Nb5 3.c8=N!

Avatar of rychessmaster1
Rocky64 wrote:

Nunn covered this B+N v N ending briefly in Secrets of Minor Piece Endings. He gave a few examples where the material arises from B+P v N, where the P must promote to a N in order to win. Even the simpler examples, composed by humans, are hard to understand, though Nunn provided a few pointers on the general winning method. He finished with a tablebase-generated position, which he called the most complex in the whole book, and that it's "beyond human ability to solve or check for soundness".

 

https://syzygy-tables.info/?fen=8/8/2P5/1n5k/5K2/8/1B6/8_w_-_-_0_1

It takes more than 50 moves to win, and the solution begins with 1.Kf5 Na7 2.c7 Nb5 3.c8=N!

That’s a REALLY optimal version, that knight can be won pretty easily because it’s already so limited 

Avatar of Rocky64
rychessmaster1 wrote:

That’s a REALLY optimal version, that knight can be won pretty easily because it’s already so limited 

It actually takes 53 moves to win the knight (just in time under the 50-move rule, because the count starts after the promotion on move 3). If you can prove Nunn-armed-with-tablebases wrong, I'd love to see it. wink.png

Avatar of rychessmaster1
Rocky64 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

That’s a REALLY optimal version, that knight can be won pretty easily because it’s already so limited 

It actually takes 53 moves to win the knight (just in time under the 50-move rule, because the count starts after the promotion on move 3). If you can prove Nunn-armed-with-tablebases wrong, I'd love to see it.

REALLY?

Ok the knight escapes to c7

And white STILL WINS?!!

Avatar of Superstargod

 

Avatar of rychessmaster1
Superstargod wrote:

 

you would like having the knight on c6, wouldnt you

Avatar of Rocky64
rychessmaster1 wrote:
Rocky64 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

That’s a REALLY optimal version, that knight can be won pretty easily because it’s already so limited 

It actually takes 53 moves to win the knight (just in time under the 50-move rule, because the count starts after the promotion on move 3). If you can prove Nunn-armed-with-tablebases wrong, I'd love to see it.

REALLY?

Ok the knight escapes to c7

And white STILL WINS?!!

Yes, the Syzygy tablebase I linked shows that after 1.Kf5 Nc7, White has a relatively quick win, because a queen promotion can't be stopped. But 1...Na7! requires White to promote to a knight in order to win, and that's the ridiculously complex variation analysed by Nunn.

Avatar of rychessmaster1
Rocky64 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
Rocky64 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

That’s a REALLY optimal version, that knight can be won pretty easily because it’s already so limited 

It actually takes 53 moves to win the knight (just in time under the 50-move rule, because the count starts after the promotion on move 3). If you can prove Nunn-armed-with-tablebases wrong, I'd love to see it.

REALLY?

Ok the knight escapes to c7

And white STILL WINS?!!

Yes, the Syzygy tablebase I linked shows that after 1.Kf5 Nc7, White has a relatively quick win, because a queen promotion can't be stopped. But 1...Na7! requires White to promote to a knight in order to win, and that's the ridiculously complex variation analysed by Nunn.

I actually meant Nc7 on move 3, not on move 1

Avatar of Rocky64
rychessmaster1 wrote:

I actually meant Nc7 on move 3, not on move 1

Um, 3...Nc7 loses to 4.Ne7 according to Syzygy. Since your first post mentioned tablebases, I assumed you knew how to look up such best play info.

Avatar of rychessmaster1
Rocky64 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

I actually meant Nc7 on move 3, not on move 1

Um, 3...Nc7 loses to 4.Ne7 according to Syzygy. Since your first post mentioned tablebases, I assumed you knew how to look up such best play info.

i have access to a tablebase but i dont always check it

Avatar of nereeren

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/36J6fCPTRY

The game I played using tablebases. Hope I won't get banned because of that.

Avatar of 2Ke21-0
nereeren wrote:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/36J6fCPTRY

The game I played using tablebases. Hope I won't get banned because of that.

Banned.

Avatar of nereeren
2Ke21-0 yazdı:
nereeren wrote:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/36J6fCPTRY

The game I played using tablebases. Hope I won't get banned because of that.

Banned.

It was only against computer in a unrated game for experiment, it's not cheating to get cheap rating.

Avatar of Afif_Mashkur

I really don't get the confusion. Am I missing anything? it seems easy. the king can't run as long as the Bishop remains in that diagonal. Ng3 is the mating move. the only worry is when the Black Knight goes to f5 preventing the mate. But if you just move around your Bishop along the diagonal, black still has to move the Knight again. and then it is mate.

Avatar of rychessmaster1
Afif_Mashkur wrote:

I really don't get the confusion. Am I missing anything? it seems easy. the king can't run as long as the Bishop remains in that diagonal. Ng3 is the mating move. the only worry is when the Black Knight goes to f5 preventing the mate. But if you just move around your Bishop along the diagonal, black still has to move the Knight again. and then it is mate.

The knight will move to e4, and if you wait it will check on f2/g5