I understand that your target audience is 7 year olds, given that only a 7 year old would pay for coaching from a 2000 rated player, but you underestimate there intelligence, as even a 7 year old could tell that this "feedback" is copied and pasted and that you told them to say such things.
Why would they say anything at all if they don't like the lessons?
Because thats what feedback is for, to share your opinion. If one sees only positive reviews then its not a accurate representation of his service (which I know is bad cos hes only 2000)
A 2000 can teach a lot of things, especially if you're say 1000. One doesn't have to be a GM to be a good teacher.
They cant teach a lot.
Maybe not to you, but they sure know a whole lot more about chess than a 1000.
I understand that your target audience is 7 year olds, given that only a 7 year old would pay for coaching from a 2000 rated player, but you underestimate there intelligence, as even a 7 year old could tell that this "feedback" is copied and pasted and that you told them to say such things.
Why would they say anything at all if they don't like the lessons?
Because thats what feedback is for, to share your opinion. If one sees only positive reviews then its not a accurate representation of his service (which I know is bad cos hes only 2000)
A 2000 can teach a lot of things, especially if you're say 1000. One doesn't have to be a GM to be a good teacher.
They cant teach a lot.