For Beginners

Sort:
Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

First of all, I'm not that much online on chess.com. So STHU

Avatar of Weirdgerman
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

First of all, I'm not that much online on chess.com. So STHU

Then why are you giving advice? 88% of chess players are better than you. You shouldnt be giving advice when you dont practice what you preach. We need practical knowledge not theoretical chatgpt nonsense.

Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu
Weirdgerman wrote:
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

First of all, I'm not that much online on chess.com. So STHU

Then why are you giving advice? 88% of chess players are better than you. You shouldnt be giving advice when you dont practice what you preach. We need practical knowledge not theoretical chatgpt nonsense.

First of all i practice with players For 2 to 3 hours ?(IRL) not in game. IDGF what you say because you are 1700 elo doesn't mean you can talk without knowing and rudely.

Avatar of Weirdgerman
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

First of all, I'm not that much online on chess.com. So STHU

Then why are you giving advice? 88% of chess players are better than you. You shouldnt be giving advice when you dont practice what you preach. We need practical knowledge not theoretical chatgpt nonsense.

First of all i practice with players For 2 to 3 hours ?(IRL) not in game. IDGF what you say because you are 1700 elo doesn't mean you can talk without knowing and rudely.

You practice 3h a day and are still 222? and i am 1700 which means i actually have practical advice. The only rude person is you for disrespecting good players who are happy to help, and then you come along spewing AI nonsense

Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu
Weirdgerman wrote:
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

First of all, I'm not that much online on chess.com. So STHU

Then why are you giving advice? 88% of chess players are better than you. You shouldnt be giving advice when you dont practice what you preach. We need practical knowledge not theoretical chatgpt nonsense.

Nothing to say to a 1700 elo

(Sorry i am only wrong

First of all i practice with players For 2 to 3 hours ?(IRL) not in game. IDGF what you say because you are 1700 elo doesn't mean you can talk without knowing and rudely.

You practice 3h a day and are still 222? and i am 1700 which means i actually have practical advice. The only rude person is you for disrespecting good players who are happy to help, and then you come along spewing AI nonsense

as i said earlier i am not that much in chess.com.

Avatar of Weirdgerman
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

First of all, I'm not that much online on chess.com. So STHU

Then why are you giving advice? 88% of chess players are better than you. You shouldnt be giving advice when you dont practice what you preach. We need practical knowledge not theoretical chatgpt nonsense.

Nothing to say to a 1700 elo

(Sorry i am only wrong

First of all i practice with players For 2 to 3 hours ?(IRL) not in game. IDGF what you say because you are 1700 elo doesn't mean you can talk without knowing and rudely.

You practice 3h a day and are still 222? and i am 1700 which means i actually have practical advice. The only rude person is you for disrespecting good players who are happy to help, and then you come along spewing AI nonsense

as i said earlier i am not that much in chess.com.

If you practice 3h a day you should not be able to lose to 200s

Avatar of Weirdgerman

also, anyone who actually studies/practices 3h a day should not lose to martin

Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu
Weirdgerman wrote:

also, anyone who actually studies/practices 3h a day should not lose to martin

I don't lose to Martin because, in early 2025, I didn't know how to play that much. Thank you.

Avatar of Weirdgerman
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

also, anyone who actually studies/practices 3h a day should not lose to martin

I don't lose to Martin because, in early 2025, I didn't know how to play that much. Thank you.

7 days ago is early 2025?

Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who plays chess for 2 years shouldnt be below 300.

Hey

Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu
Weirdgerman wrote:
ArnavIsHereForu hat geschrieben:
Weirdgerman wrote:

Also, anyone who actually studies/practices 3h a day should not lose to martin

I don't lose to Martin because, in early 2025, I didn't know how to play that much. Thank you.

7 days ago is early 2025?

First of all it is not an excuse on Oct 5 2025 I was out and i couldn't focus properly I'm just frustrated because of you saying things about me.

Avatar of Weirdgerman

thats an excuse

Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu
Weirdgerman wrote:

thats an excuse

It is not

Avatar of ArnavIsHereForu
Weirdgerman wrote:

thats an excuse

I just realised ur from Austria and ur username is weirdgerman cry