King and King problem

Sort:
JJG54
Look I just wanna let y'all know to all the beginers that don't know much about chess when you have your king and your other king and your in problems you might say oh then I will just get the king with my king but no that's wrong you see king and King can't be close to each other or get the king whit your king because there not the targets so there just sitting at the castle since there the king's so they really don't do much of a job and can't move that far so yeah now you know that ...
AngryNaartjie

Take a breath!

Then, please edit this so that it makes sense. I'm not trying to be a d***, I'm actually interested in what you were trying to say.

JJG54

I wasn't trying to help but ok

AngryNaartjie

I believe you are trying to help. That is why I want to read it.
But I have no idea what you are trying to say. It's one single sentence that does not make sense. 
Please rewrite it because I want to know what you tried to tell us.

ChxtNoir
@JJG54
I’m sorry, but what? I don’t understand what you’re saying at all.
ponz111

The original post makes no sense--maybe English is his 2nd or 3rd language?   

Sponglewang5000
I understand what he’s saying. I also believe he wasn’t trying to help. He was just saying stuff hahahaha
Ilampozhil25

ok he means that beginners think that

this position is winnable because they think

that this can happen and white will win with king takes king

but that this is illegal and "the kings will stay in their castles"

and cant take each other because "they cant move very far"

like in xiangqi lol

so basically he thinks this is like xiangqi where the kings cant leave a 3x3 box but thats false

AngryNaartjie

Dude! That was amazing! Like, they need to create an award called "Babble Interpreter" or something. I will be the first to send it to you.

Ilampozhil25

thanks