I managed to do it ( I play white ):
He should had count pices before, becouse before any move he is ready down on material, as in you have your queen and he doesn't.
What I don't understand is why each of you have 3 rooks.
961 chess? :)
Yes :) using possibilities chess board and PGN offer ...
This doesn't use castling
Funny, how black pawn goes under the knight !
Again - 2 pieces - i wonder how 3 pieces to be taken - but may be it's impossible .
Castle queenside on move 1? Or that is also 2, I'm not sure how this works...
How did the pawn go through the knight I thought that was against the rules.
More like 69 chess... f'ed up backwards and forwards.
Black no Queen in begin.
I don't see how this is possible, f5 is impossible with the knight at f6.
yes it was. But I think this is just for fun. White made a en passant move by capturing the Knight. :) But that's impossible.
It is always interesting to look at something that is impossible :)
King's gambit - enhanced , finally transposed in Sicilian
Yes you can lose 2 pieces in one move. There is a difference between losing and have them captured. In a move only one piece can be captured. While a piece that can not escape from being captured like the next following move is lost while on the move being made 1 piece is being captured. Capture 1 piece this move and capture the other piece next move.
Too late... I already read it.