a3 should be a dark square, as well as c3.
oh man ...and we wonder why chess players don't get girlfriends
I play chess to play chess. I do other things for "getting girlfriends."
a3 should be a dark square, as well as c3.
oh man ...and we wonder why chess players don't get girlfriends
I play chess to play chess. I do other things for "getting girlfriends."
You're right, your generalization of chess players didn't deserve a response.
Not quite personalities, but...
Military:
Pawns - Soldiers at the front line. Slowly pushes their way into enemy territory.
Knights - Grenade tossers. Hand tossing grenades at enemies within a radius.
Bishops - Snipers. Long ranged shots slipping past obstacles.
Rooks - Tanks. Rolls over and destroys things in its path.
Queen - Missile/air support. Strife away.
King - Control center defender. Stops things that gets too close.
Honinbo and Sunshiny I love your responses xD
Crackin up reading Hon's and Sun, I like how you view the wooden battlefield
As to those talking about chess and girlfriends ive as yet to snag one that way but the two one night stands the games netted me leave me optomistic for my fellow players -nevermind that it keeps my current bedmate entertained ;)
I don't ever remember getting together with a woman on a basis of chess. It may still happen and certainly be cute.
Being with a woman and then later doing chess together - of course this happened many many times... what can you do? It's part of who I am.
Breaking with a woman over chess? I've seen it happen to some other people. Guess they were a bit more obsessed about the game than even I am...
haha, id be lying if i said the fact my ex prefured checkers to chess didnt factor into the reasons for me ending it xD
pawns: weaklings who are willing to die for the greater good: almost like kamikaze fighters, except less destructive in general
rooks: drunken idiots who can pack a punch
knights: the type of cards player who can cheat easily at will, can tell good jokes
bishops: very accurate, assassins who will stop at nothing to see the opponent dead.
queen: A sprinter: very quick and fast who can deal the decisive blow, however it is too powerful for its own good.
king: the lazy fat king who always asks for fourths at dinner.
I like that, fourths at dinner xD
Point interest to all, why is like 3 out of 4 king descripts lasy? xD
pawns: weaklings who are willing to die for the greater good: almost like kamikaze fighters, except less destructive in general
rooks: drunken idiots who can pack a punch
knights: the type of cards player who can cheat easily at will, can tell good jokes
bishops: very accurate, assassins who will stop at nothing to see the opponent dead.
queen: A sprinter: very quick and fast who can deal the decisive blow, however it is too powerful for its own good.
king: the lazy fat king who always asks for fourths at dinner.
This might be my favorite comment in this thread!
Wonderfull thread!
Rook - Out of the box thinker. Who said that castles can't move?
King - Arrogant. Thinks everything evolves around him.
Queen - Busy type. Always working.
Knight - Crazy idiot, Clown.
Bishop - Oppinionated and stubborn. Will stick to his colour. Can however sacrifice himself for the greater good.
Pawns - Joyfull bunch of morphers. Although can block your plans if you mistreat them.
King: master- good leader kind hearted
Queen: 2nd in comand- very possessive protective
Knight: cavalier- selfless speedy loyal reliable
Rook: tank- cold protective short fuse tough reliable
Bishop: healer and clergyman- sweet shy
Pawn: foot soilder- energetic loyal submissive protective reliable
You're right, your generalization of chess players didn't deserve a response.
Not quite personalities, but...
Military:
Pawns - Soldiers at the front line. Slowly pushes their way into enemy territory.
Knights - Grenade tossers. Hand tossing grenades at enemies within a radius.
Bishops - Snipers. Long ranged shots slipping past obstacles.
Rooks - Tanks. Rolls over and destroys things in its path.
Queen - Missile/air support. Strife away.
King - Control center defender. Stops things that gets too close.
What is the Logic/philosophy terms of this words? using "Without" that parts then "Just Like Logic -" what happened? Thank you sir I hope you answer.
I would like to ask About chess board game Like Logic as A. Queen, B. Pawn, C. Rook, D. Knight, E. King?
What is the Logic term of individual parts. example What happened if without "King" and What is the Logic terms. Thanks.
People who like queen are independent chill
People who like pawns are patient loyal
People who like bishops are passive aggressive
People who like rooks are blunt honest
People who like knight are sly sneaky
People who like kings are self centered jerks
Each piece matched with its animal personality:
Pawn: Wolf -loyal and is strongest in packs
Knight: Horse -is nimble and courageous
Bishop: Hawk -can strike sharply from a distance
Rook: Rhino -pummels anything it in path but is clumsy
Queen: Lioness -the strongest and most agile hunter
King: Lion -strong and majestic but lazy
solskytz wrote:
"How about differences in character between different pawns?
A-pawn - shy and edgy
B-pawn - likes to embarrass enemy pieces by suddenly making the 2-square jump
C-pawn - always frustrated as he's just off the center (so bullies the enemy D-pawn continually)
D-pawn - confident as the big lady protects him
E-pawn - the eternal 'why me?' guy on the first move of open games
F-pawn - the risk taker, the guy who shouldn't have moved off of f2
G-pawn - if this isn't a fianchetto or some theoretical Sicilian attacking move, it was probably an error
H-pawn - the 'amateur-move' pawn
- - - - - - - - - -
It's possible to differentiate character according to the exact square, for example
a2 is really the shy guy in the corner, while a3 is the 'you won't come in' tough doorman, or 'the question-putter', and so on, and so forth"
I like the idea of that. The Game and Playe of the Chesse, as I think it is called, provides different occupations for the pawns (lowlife, guard, etc.). The leftmost pawn would probably be left-handed, since the book calls attention to the fact that they are sinister, which also means left.
The king is a God.
The rest are slaves.