maybe it iss very secret
2 brilliant (!!) moves in the same game
Sort:
!!!!
That is not true lol
Not true
na a rickroll has to be the video, not the picture
Jul 19, 2022
0
#47
tobstar123 wrote:
na a rickroll has to be the video, not the picture
HAHAHA!
Fail.
DrSpudnik wrote:
tobstar123 wrote:
na a rickroll has to be the video, not the picture
HAHAHA!
Fail.
lol
I made two brilliant moves in sequence in a recent game
I just looked at my stats. Apparently, it claims I've made 650 brilliant moves.
Apr 8, 2023
0
#51
they were kinda brilliant but there are better moves!
trqesk wrote:
they were kinda brilliant but there are better moves!
uhh, do you know what a brilliant move is? it is the best move that is a very hard move to find and it often has an amazing idea
Tobstar123 wrote:
trqesk wrote:
they were kinda brilliant but there are better moves!
uhh, do you know what a brilliant move is? it is the best move that is a very hard move to find and it often has an amazing idea
This is not even close to the truth.
I bet that you got that from chess.com topics, before 2020 it was a very popular notion, even though it is obviously not true.
May 2, 2023
0
#56
I was given two "brilliant" moves in this game played as white in the 30 minute rapid format as a guest. These were moves 14 and 16, positional sacrifices of the knight and the exchange, both designed to exploit the queen-side isolation of blacks pieces and to open up the center onto a vulnerable king. While the term "brilliant" may be overused and not apply here for some, I do think that both moves were pretty good, given that the returns for these sacrifices were not immediately calculable.
magipi wrote:
Tobstar123 wrote:
trqesk wrote:
they were kinda brilliant but there are better moves!
uhh, do you know what a brilliant move is? it is the best move that is a very hard move to find and it often has an amazing idea
This is not even close to the truth.
I bet that you got that from chess.com topics, before 2020 it was a very popular notion, even though it is obviously not true.
na, I didn't
It says in the review games that a brilliant move is classified when the move is "The best move. And tricky to find too!"
so yeah
The official chess.com forum says that is when the best move is played and it has a piece sacrifice.
so I was correct
what did you think it was?
Tobstar123 wrote:
so I was correct
You were not correct, not even close. First of all, it does not have to be the best move. There are hundreds of examples in various topics around the forums for that. Second, "hard to find" is a subjective thing so obviously it is not included in the definition.
The actual definition is close to "a sacrifice that is good (but not necessarily the best)". However, there are many variables that are unknown and we can't even guess. For example, the definition changes a bit based on the rating of the player.
magipi wrote:
Tobstar123 wrote:
so I was correct
the definition changes a bit based on the rating of the player.
yeah, the lower the rating then the easier it is to get a brilliant.
it says you cant acsses