a lead in development
Sort:
May 28, 2008
0
#3
Gambitking wrote:
Why does white resign? It's his move. Can't with K-KKt3 he keep his king on his side of the pawns and draw? And a lot of these moves I didn't understand. It didn't look like the classical 'Dutch Defence' at all. (Although if given the White side, I'd play the Staunton gambit! ROFL)
The Gambit King
it wasnt a classical dutch it was a dutch defence hopton attack variation. and to pick you're brain a liitle are you laughing because the Stauton Gambit would have faired better or because statistically black wins 41.8% instead of 28% of the time with that particular gambit?
i also dun get it why white must resign...
May 28, 2008
0
#5
if you dont care for my post than dont post a reply your obviously a good player if you're a NM tonydal. post a better dutch and express yourself on your page.
May 28, 2008
0
#6
as i explained this game was for my benefit... I'm the terrible black player and this game helped me... if it doesnt help you, just as most of my posts probably wont than do me a solid and ignore the post entirely... I say to you good day.
Cloy,
When you post to a public forum, you'll get responses from the public. If you don't want responses, don't post. It's quite simple. If you were really concerned with your benefit, perhaps you'd note the analysis of such a good player as tonydal and learn from it rather than being an a...
I am a terrible player with black I trade pieces whenever i can and attempt to take tempo control whenever possible. This in mind i know that a bishop is stronger than a knight in end game but I thought if you can gain a little time on white than a knight is just fine. (by the way I love the Dutch... this is my third post on it and all...) TRADE TRADE TRADE... and eh... maybe I'll win.