dont make the stupid king move...
A too complicated game that need much analysis
Sort:
Kf2.
27. rf1 w/ the plan of e6 winning the knight
26.Rh4 (instead of Qe7+) and you must win - black knight can't escape .
5. Bg5 is more aggressive , pin that knight !
8. U made a castle but where did u plan to attack ? u have blocked ur c and f peon c4 or f4 before u developed ur knights would accelerate ur attack
11. Bd3 would be better cos it's better diagonal for ur attack on white king
27. "with the idea of centralizing my king" far from time for centralization
msoewulff wrote:
looks like a typical game for me.
A bit too complicated for a beginner like me.
@Morphy27 Thank you! I can't believe I missed that ~ Thank you so much
@bolshevikhellraiser I think you meant the bishop but thanks, that was a win for me as well.
Well, I guess I been reading too much joke topics like Bongcloud attack and got into the joke mode and I actually started messing around with stupid king moves, but I guess I'm healed now. This game brought me back to reality.
msoewulff wrote:
ha, you are higher rated than me.
I really don't get why you are saying this. I really couldn't care less of my low and trashy rating.
#Skwerly I have Fritz, but I think I totally forgot about that, but sometimes I just prefer doing analysis here, if I am not mistaken, this is allowed?? There is a forum section called Game Analysis so I assume it's not totally stupid to post your own games here and have people help you analyze them?
@AnthonyCG
haha well, it's all today's daily puzzle's fault that I took the draw! I am scared of "Running out of check spams" now lol! Like in today's daily puzzle.
@15.h5!!
That is one great move, it is so true I don't need that lame bishop on b3, I may have succeeded with my attack if I played 15.h5!!
Thanks for the tips. 
I love how "Check Spam" sounds..
Jul 15, 2011
0
#13
duskrevival wrote:
msoewulff wrote:
ha, you are higher rated than me.
I really don't get why you are saying this. I really couldn't care less of my low and trashy rating.
#Skwerly I have Fritz, but I think I totally forgot about that, but sometimes I just prefer doing analysis here, if I am not mistaken, this is allowed?? There is a forum section called Game Analysis so I assume it's not totally stupid to post your own games here and have people help you analyze them?
oh yea, for sure! i just prefer going through games with my engine, but i guess some feedback is nice too! i wasn't being mean. :)
duskrevival: personally, I think you succeeded with your attack. A queen against two knights is a solid material edge. It might not be a quick mate, but it's still successful and in this case, it gave you a won position when the dust settled.
As far as closing out the game, though, I think you prolonged things with 27: Kd2? when Rf1!, is crushing. (If black answers with Rf8, white has Qg5 followed by Qf6+! with a mating net developing. The only other option to defend is Nh6, which is similarly hopeless). Even after allowing your opponent piece coordination, which prolonged things greatly and prevented any kind of final shot from reappearing, however, you were winning easilly, even up until the very end.
A nice game!
6.Bc4 was not so good, better was Bd3!
I fail to understand how you missed the opportunity to attack with 9.g4!! and h4! and black would be forced to defend, allowing you to gain a huge advantage
12.b5 was a greedy mistake by your opponent, when he could have equalized with f5! preventing your kingside attack before it comes.
where is 2.Ke2? lol
Title says it all, this game is kinda too complicated, so there are probably millions of errors, so analysis is needed and I need some help.
Thanks in advance.