An example of good knight vs. bad bishop

Sort:
dinkir9

Thoughts?

JMB2010
Weing94 wrote:

First of all, why did white didnt move his rook from danger when he was attacked by black knight Nf2.If black intends to attack with Nd3 on next move,white king can move to c2.

But then Rxc1+

 

 

 

dinkir, this was a very well played game by you! :)

Phylar

Well played. But don't go harrassing your opponents mistakes like that. A good game speaks for itself.

DiogenesDue

Less insulting and aggrandizing in your annotations and more insight into the game, please.  Thanks ;).

White made a blunder on move 19 and gave you a free pawn with check.  That is basically the story here, isn't it?  If he had played a3 first and left your knight alone for 1 move, your queenside attack stalls (with one knight pushed back and a doubled pawn) and he pushes through on the f file...

dinkir9
btickler wrote:

Less insulting and aggrandizing in your annotations and more insight into the game, please.  Thanks ;).

White made a blunder on move 19 and gave you a free pawn with check.  That is basically the story here, isn't it?  If he had played a3 first and left your knight alone for 1 move, your queenside attack stalls (with one knight pushed back and a doubled pawn) and he pushes through on the f file...

Allll true lol, it just; gives me pride ya know? To get into such a position regardless of how you get there.. and you're talking to a player who rarely wins any games so, it's nice when a plan comes together

Bereng

Hmmm... should he have resigned here? It seems he might have a chance of getting a draw, although I'm not at all sure.

JMB2010
Bereng wrote:

Hmmm... should he have resigned here? It seems he might have a chance of getting a draw, although I'm not at all sure.

Nah, the knight can mop up the pawns.

Cobra2721

well done

KingPawnTommy

nah i disagree because rooks are better