Best Game in history- Try and find a Blunder
Sort:
letsgohome
Oct 10, 2013
0
#1
[COMMENT DELETED]
"Try and find a Blunder"
Well... your opponent made a bunch. I couldn't find any glaring blunders that you made, but there were a couple of moves that I didn't like, such as 2. d4, 20. g6 and 24. bf5. If your opponent had responded accurately he would have been able to obtain and maintain a significant material adanatge.
Oct 10, 2013
0
#4
2. That is best opening, since it frees up space for my bishops and waste time for the opponent if he does accept the gambit.
20. Attacks his defenses
24. Very strong move
These high ranks dont know anything. Too rigid in your studies
Oct 10, 2013
0
#5
All talk. no one wants to play me and show me my blunders. Jealousy is not a good charateristic brah.
2.d4 is the best opening? lol. This is not a great game at all, and yes, I am very jealous of you.
Oct 10, 2013
0
#7
letsgohome wrote:
2. That is best opening, since it frees up space for my bishops and waste time for the opponent if he does accept the gambit.
20. Attacks his defenses
24. Very strong move
These high ranks dont know anything. Too rigid in your studies
Expert analysis. I like your style!
When you offer coaching services, I'll be first in the queue.
Doggy_Style wrote:
letsgohome wrote:
2. That is best opening, since it frees up space for my bishops and waste time for the opponent if he does accept the gambit.
20. Attacks his defenses
24. Very strong move
These high ranks dont know anything. Too rigid in your studies
Expert analysis. I like your style!
When you offer coaching services, I'll be first in the queue.
I'll be second! I love the way that u corrected me so convincingly and ruthlessly!
Very similar to this post:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/how-many-faces
The longer you look, the more you find.....
rooperi wrote:
Very similar to this post:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/how-many-faces
The longer you look, the more you find.....
lol good one. Guess I didn't look long enough!
Black just traded his queen for a pawn. I think that's a blunder.
Oct 10, 2013
0
#12
You cannot afford my coaching. I thought chess is for high IQ people, but my analysis is sarcastism. And you know what's funny IT is actually more in depth than your analysis. LMAO
Hey letsgohome:
I just challenged u to a game. So far out of everyone who's posted in this thread I'm the lowest rated by far, so you should have no trouble at all getting an easy victory.
Wanna play live chess letsgohome? After I lose you can show me where I went wrong.
letsgohome wrote:
I thought chess is for high IQ people, but my analysis is sarcastism.
lol BEST QUOTE EVER
Oct 10, 2013
0
#16
Even more similar to this post:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/need-help-analyzing3?lc=1#last_comment
i like your style, sir
letsgohome wrote:
Lol. Challenge me to live game 5/2
let's do it! And after u beat me, maybe you can demonstrate your high IQ by analyzing our game with sarcastism!