Computer Analysis is CR*P!!!

PGN of the analysis not the game lol...

Go play out the game move by move with your friend, Cnacnel, and then submit it for analysis yourself. Do not bother me anymore.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

They have a few diffent computers to play against here, at least one "easy" and one "hard" if I recall correctly. Try playing them and you might be surprised to discover there's no direct correlation between mediocre PC analysis and mediocre OTB play, at least not for the "hard" PC.

As for the mediocre analysis here it's still good for pointing out blunders and alternate lines, its free, its fast, and it doesn't hog up CPU or RAM resources on your PC.

If you want better analysis try doing your own for starters don't rely 100% on any software to analyze your games AND

Download Arena and/or Winboard (free chess programs)

Download several world-class free chess engines and start using them to help you analyze your games with 

BTW how did you get a USCF rating of 4580?

http://www.zfchess.com/engines.html

Thanks, NimzoRoy. I guess you get what you pay for. The computer analysis is cheap, but not totally free. You need an upgraded membership for unlimited computer analysis. It is not worth it.

Maybe Chess.com can provide good computer analysis for paid members and mediocre analysis for nonpaying members.

About my 4580 rating? It was to prove a point. Anyone can write or claim pretty much anything they want to in cyberspace. (I'm really Bobby Fischer. I faked my death so that I can get online and play anonymously bad chess as a girl. It's all part of my plan to prove that I can give any woman knight odds and win. Mua-ah-ah!!)

Check out my new USCF rating, Nimzo!

Maybe Chess.com can provide good computer analysis for paid members and mediocre analysis for nonpaying members. LadyMisil

I believe that's what they claim to be doing now, or at least that was my understanding when I joined a few yrs ago - that the premium members got analysis from a "better" PC.

Your new rating is impressive - and also by coincidence (as you probably know) the # of ports available on most PCs.

And watch we're you're pointing that bow & arrow - someone could get hurt - like me for instance!

That's because walking your king there was pointless. It was completely safe with no threats against it, all you did is allow white more time. You also keept delaying re8 near the end for some pointless moves, such as a5. I wouldn't say you blundered here, but you did make a few mistakes and many inaccuracies.

Why post a thread where people can comment if you're just going to get pissed off at them all? Seems illogical to me. You made inaccuracies and mistakes, even to a human eye. Like it or not.

It's common in the interweb, like trolls and haters.

You mean... "do what I should have done when posting this thread" ?

Maybe if you want to convince others of your point, you have to try harder ?

The computer gave me my two blunders as Ke7 and Kd7. Starr, walking the king was not necessary but it was not pointless either. These were Petrosian-like moves. I was going to breakthrough anyway, but like any Master, they place ALL of their pieces in their best spots before they break the position. And I am by no means a Master.

As for giving White time, time to do what? He could do absolutely nothing but wait for me to eventually take the e-pawn. If you can find useful moves to set up a defense, then you are a better player than I can ever hope to be. Be my guest.

Finally, there is an endgame strategy to make noncommitting moves just to probe your opponent's position. You often end up back in the same position but at least now you know your opponent has all the defenses to the crushing wins. You then play your last trump, which you hope will barely eke out the win. That was not the case here, but that is good chess, not mistakes or inaccuracies. If you can win in one move or checkmate in ten, you may choose the mate while I will usually choose the one move resignation win. My move is not a mistake, it is a matter of preference.

Starr, the idea was to warn people that the Chess.com computer analysis is cr*p. Idiotic remarks and statements were not what I was looking for.

I wouldn't go as far as to call it crap. In fact I really like it, buts that's just my two pence.

So Irontiger, do your statements mean you think the Chess.com computer analysis is a wonderfully accurate piece of work?

MatchStick, I respect your comment and your opinion ... but my accusation still stands. At least you have made an informed opinion without just making a thoughtless idiotic remark. Thank you.

No. Yet, you could switch off the binary "it's useless OR it's perfect" way of thinking.

The computer analysis spots tactical mistakes, mates in 10, etc. That's exactly what I expect it to do. But yes, you have to think by yourself along it, what a shame, really.

My post did not even mention that. If you come up with something to say, you have to defend it, not to say to others they are idiots if they don't think alike. If it were so obvious, why have you bothered start a thread ?

I was frustrated wasting half an hour looking at that computer's analysis. Usually I used my own. I will use my own from now on.

I could not understand your first post at all. I had no idea what you were trying to say or get at. This one is very clear.

Andy's remarks were idiotical. I do not know if Andy himself is an idiot or not. If you feel that his remarks were made with a lot of thought, or at least some thought, then that is your opinion. I still believe he saw my post and was just out to trash it without even thinking about anything.

Anyway, this post seems to have strayed from its original purpose. Perhaps better I delete all my posts and never make another one. As someone commented in this thread, haters are common, particularly his friends.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha