Forums

Hate to boast but this win is sheer poetry

Sort:
2Ke21-0
Bill-Hicks wrote:

Just pulled off another one

No mistakes, no blunders, no missed wins and 90% + accuracy.

I love chess.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/4538548695?tab=analysisf 

A nice game, but dependent on your opponent to hasten up you're victory. Why don't you play a game against @Pfren and see if you still love chess.

IMKeto
Bill-Hicks wrote:

Just pulled off another one

No mistakes, no blunders, no missed wins and 90% + accuracy.

I love chess.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/4538548695?tab=analysis

Send another Thank You card to your opponent.

The thing in all of this is that you are not going to improve as long as your fascinated with some ill advised engines verbiage that is meant to do nothing but stroke your ego. 

Playing the way you play against anyone better, and you won't be enjoying chess as much. 

But...if all youre looking for is an ego feed, then carry on.

 

2Ke21-0
IMBacon wrote:
Bill-Hicks wrote:

Just pulled off another one

No mistakes, no blunders, no missed wins and 90% + accuracy.

I love chess.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/4538548695?tab=analysis

Send another Thank You card to your opponent.

The thing in all of this is that you are not going to improve as long as your fascinated with some ill advised engines verbiage that is meant to do nothing but stroke your ego. 

Playing the way you play against anyone better, and you won't be enjoying chess as much. 

But...if all youre looking for is an ego feed, then carry on.

 

+1

2Ke21-0

Everybody ignore this thread. Such egotistical players who convince themselves of perfect play based on an inaccurate computer statistic (by the way, everybody's scored better than 97%, so 94% isn't a huge accomplishment) will never make progress.

Nicator65
StinkingHyena wrote:
pfren wrote:

 

At least at one point I am not sure that’s a fair evaluation.

2 e5 I don’t believe deserves the question mark.

While all your points are fair, I would also mention the following. e5 cramps blacks game and promotes a king side attack. After 2 ... c5 white has moves like f4 and Nf3 to reinforce the pawn, and if the d file is opened the backward d pawn and hole at d6 could cause black issues.

After e5 the position is balanced, losing whites first move advantage a bit quicker than most king pawn openings to be sure, but I don’t think deserving of the question mark.

Hmmm, 2.e5 overextends White's position without support. Black can develop actively aiming at e5 and eliminate the advance outpost at will with Pd7-d6 or Pf7-f6. And Pf2-f4 is the same as adding more money into a business that's already going bad given that Black gets active on the diagonals a7-g1 and h4-e1 thus making the opening of the "d" and "f" files much more dangerous for White.

By concept, 2.e5 is bad because it handles the initiative to Black. The best White can do, again by concept, is to consolidate by letting e5 go and finishing his development, as stubbornness in keeping e5 will only increase Black's initiative. 

CorporateChessGuy

Hi all, I stream chess for 1200-1800 Rated players,I solve tactics, plays with viewers, puzzle battle wth CM's, long blitz games for analzing purpose too. Do checkout and Drop me a follow on twitch.tv/corporatechessguy if you like it. Lets learn Play and grow together!Happy to help! :) :) Just send with a Fdz request on chessdotcom and let's get started!

Asparagusic_acids
goldenwriter wrote:

analysis said the move was "Brilliant"

That was a simple tactic.