You have nothing to fear. chess.com doesn't even use the game report "accuracy" (called CAPS) as a part of their cheat detection. I am not currently a part of the Fair Play team, but their methods are much more sophisticated than CAPS (which stands for Computer Aggregated Precision Score). Here is a little information on CAPS from chess.com's @DanielRensch
I got 100 accuracy and im scared
Sort:
Mar 9, 2024
0
#3
Yeah, I don’t think CAPS is that accurate anyway. Earlier, I played a game in which I won because of an easy opening, but a hard fought endgame. My opponent was almost 1100, and CAPS rated them at 500, but they were better than that even with the blunder.
U just played all the best moves somehow in a simple game. Nice win but yeah, ur good. Magnus Carlsen played a game with 3850 estimated Elo and 98 percent accuracy with the win. I played a game once with 2250 estimated elo and a 97 percent accuracy with the win so u have nothing to worry about. Magnus didn’t get banned even tho he had an elo higher than a medium-low stockfish depth, which is 3700.
I am 1172 and in my most recent game i played at 100 percent accuracy with an estimated elo of 1900. The game only consisted of 11 moves however. Will chesscom ban me or something? Here's the infamous game in question-
i played black