I love being stubborn!

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game.html?id=46977555   here is a game that got to a middle game that im not used to or familiar with. No tactics, just strategy, and strange positions.The game continued with pieces constantly being traded up until the endgame, no one was ever a piece ahead. The end game however is where I was stubborn. I messed up when it was only the knights and kings on the board, but I still forced a draw through sheer stubbornness. Can any of you see where I could have won, or at least gotten ahead at any point in this game? I'm doing a computer analysis on it too, because I was clueless in that middle game, so people help me D:

and note* I forced a draw against a higher rated opponent, that counts for something right? x)

White was in a better position than you.  He threw away his advantage though and you took advantage of that, which is commendable.

yes, but can you find anywhere where "I" could have gotten the advantage?

Why no one claimed draw for 20 moves?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_and_pawn_versus_king_endgame#Rook_pawn

I DID !! can you believe what my opponent said when I told him draw was inevidable, he said, "time will decide" and declined my draw. but silly him, draw happened anyway. 

woow, how did I miss that, the computer analysis said the same thing. 

71. Kg6 wins for white after: 

This is so cool, having a national master actually reviewing my game :D