BTW I Change My Profile Pic After That A Bit Later
Imposible Brilliant
Sort:
Dec 19, 2024
0
#3
This is completelly absurd. Qd7 is by far not the best move. Game review is getting more and more stupid.
borovicka75 wrote:
This is completelly absurd. Qd7 is by far not the best move. Game review is getting more and more stupid.
Cuz I Am Only 170 Elo
Dec 20, 2024
0
#5
borovicka75 wrote:
This is completelly absurd. Qd7 is by far not the best move. Game review is getting more and more stupid.
brilliant moves only mean that your sacrificing a piece but the eval stays roughly the same, its kinda stupid
I Just Don't Care About The Bishop
Don’t know. Just writing this for achievement.
Wow
I've blocked from checkmate
Wtf
How About This
Dec 27, 2024
0
#13
Nxd4 is obviosly best move, black win healthy pawn because Nxd4 is met by winning the queen, but from human perspective it is not !! Because for experienced player it is quite simple.
Lmao Again
In the first position, did you notice that Qd7 actually doesn't defend your bishop on h3 (as it is attacked twice and can be taken)?
In the third position, did you notice that your a8 rook is hanging? If yes, why did you decide to sacrifice it?
IDK What R U Talking About
Optimissed wrote:
magipi wrote:
In the first position, did you notice that Qd7 actually doesn't defend your bishop on h3 (as it is attacked twice and can be taken)?
In the third position, did you notice that your a8 rook is hanging? If yes, why did you decide to sacrifice it?
From the first position, Qd2 is a very good move. If then R takes B, black plays e4 and the white Q must stay in contact with the R it's protecting. So black can play Nxc4 and then Bxa1 if white has moved Qe3 and has to recapture the N. So Black has won the exchange and is now an exchange and two pawns up, with the g7 B on a1, which white can trap by c6 but can't win the bishop. White's position is bust open with no counterplay. It white instead retreats the Q to g2 and instead of capturing the N plays c3, protecting the Ra1, white has freed the e5 sq for his N, plays Ne5 and has a fantastically dominating position.
What is the point of stating all these? Do you really think there is any chance that a 200-rated player thought through all this? Moreover, do you think that a 200-rated player can even understand any of this? Zero chance.
Optimissed wrote:
magipi wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
magipi wrote:
In the first position, did you notice that Qd7 actually doesn't defend your bishop on h3 (as it is attacked twice and can be taken)?
In the third position, did you notice that your a8 rook is hanging? If yes, why did you decide to sacrifice it?
From the first position, Qd2 is a very good move. If then R takes B, black plays e4 and the white Q must stay in contact with the R it's protecting. So black can play Nxc4 and then Bxa1 if white has moved Qe3 and has to recapture the N. So Black has won the exchange and is now an exchange and two pawns up, with the g7 B on a1, which white can trap by c6 but can't win the bishop. White's position is bust open with no counterplay. It white instead retreats the Q to g2 and instead of capturing the N plays c3, protecting the Ra1, white has freed the e5 sq for his N, plays Ne5 and has a fantastically dominating position.
What is the point of stating all these? Do you really think there is any chance that a 200-rated player thought through all this? Moreover, do you think that a 200-rated player can even understand any of this? Zero chance.
Because it's technically the best move. All I'm doing is explaining the reasons why it is the best move. The 200 rated player did not understand why it was such a strong move and I explained both for his benefit but also for your benefit.
It's not the best move at all (not even in the top 3). Other moves win material by force and this one does not.
Also, you were "explaining" things, without even bothering to check if it was indeed the best move or not? This is rich, dude.
Optimissed wrote:
magipi wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
magipi wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
magipi wrote:
In the first position, did you notice that Qd7 actually doesn't defend your bishop on h3 (as it is attacked twice and can be taken)?
In the third position, did you notice that your a8 rook is hanging? If yes, why did you decide to sacrifice it?
From the first position, Qd2 is a very good move. If then R takes B, black plays e4 and the white Q must stay in contact with the R it's protecting. So black can play Nxc4 and then Bxa1 if white has moved Qe3 and has to recapture the N. So Black has won the exchange and is now an exchange and two pawns up, with the g7 B on a1, which white can trap by c6 but can't win the bishop. White's position is bust open with no counterplay. It white instead retreats the Q to g2 and instead of capturing the N plays c3, protecting the Ra1, white has freed the e5 sq for his N, plays Ne5 and has a fantastically dominating position.
What is the point of stating all these? Do you really think there is any chance that a 200-rated player thought through all this? Moreover, do you think that a 200-rated player can even understand any of this? Zero chance.
Because it's technically the best move. All I'm doing is explaining the reasons why it is the best move. The 200 rated player did not understand why it was such a strong move and I explained both for his benefit but also for your benefit.
It's not the best move at all (not even in the top 3). Other moves win material by force and this one does not.
Also, you were "explaining" things, without even bothering to check if it was indeed the best move or not? This is rich, dude.
Do you mean I didn't use the engine analysis to check my thinking? Quite right, I didn't. What do you think the top three moves are, in that position. See if you can convince me. I might agree with you, you never know.
Next time you probably should check the engine analysis before confidently trashtalking people who did check it (like Borovicka). It will spare you another embarrassment.
Optimissed wrote:
Why do you think the engine analysis is particularly strong? It often makes mistakes because it's set to roughly a three or four move look-ahead.
I think you might have spent the last 50 years in a coma. That would explain a lot of things.
So get ready for a BIG reveal: no, engines do not look only 3-4 moves ahead. This would have been an absurd claim even in the 1980s.
Brilliant With 170 Elo???????