100% acurracy
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/137474721328?tab=review
I feel it was a bit unfair not to give me 100% for this one. I believe the reason is that the engine evaluated 8. Ne2 as stronger than 8. d5. The reason this is unfair is that it is only so on lower depth of analysis. If you let it think longer, it agrees d5 is best. (It's surprising that Ne2 is ever viewed as strongest, but engines move in mysterious ways).
You can get a 100% accuracy in a game although it's very very rare and unusual
Yes
I hear at a conference something interesting: if a man is in the woods and he sais something...is he still wrong?
Rather interesting, I have, indeed checkmated my opponent with 100percent accuracy, we have not known each other since then, guess I gotta thank him for doing bad moves which led to me playing the best move every time. I was using my primary account, which I have 1350 bullet rating, while my opponent was 1300 rated.
I got 99.6% accuracy, but my moves were all book moves or perfect moves. Is it possible to get 100% accuracy?
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/4374335351?tab=report
I know EXACTLY why they still got 99.6% accuracy, so everyone listen. Bh6_Anti-Dragon had good book moves, but they weren't the BEST book moves. The book moves weren't at the top. Is the truth disappointing?