"One bad move nullifies 40 good ones". It can happen and it's really no big deal. Accuracy is just a rough estimate used to compare playing strength in relation to other players, don't focus too much on it.
Less accurate and winner ?
Sort:
Apr 26, 2020
0
#3
The winner of a chess game is the player who makes the next-to-last mistake.
Apr 28, 2020
0
#4
I only look at the chess analzyer if it says "Brilliant Move" 
Everything else, I ignore 
blueemu wrote:
The winner of a chess game is the player who makes the next-to-last mistake.
What if the losing side makes two final mistakes in a row?
eric0022 hat geschrieben:
blueemu wrote:
The winner of a chess game is the player who makes the next-to-last mistake.
What if the losing side makes two final mistakes in a row?
Then the losing side still made the next-to-last mistake
Hello, everybody.
It me, Luciano, from Brazil;
Im a begginer and Im trying to understand the engine analysis of the game provided by chess.com.
Is it common to win games even when you are less accurate than your oponent? Sometimes I win games being less accurate than them, and It sounds quite counter-intuitive to me.
Thank you for your attention.
(You can se two example below ("Precisão" = "accuracy" in portuguese)