My first complete rated game at chess.com

Sort:
jwhitesj

I tried to do the best I could here with the annotations.  Please, tell me what you think.

I am especially curious on how I should have handled his opening.

Mebeme

great played game, and great annotations, hope i can play you sometime :)

erik

good game! i agree with your annotations :)

PeaceMakerZero

Very well done - you should be proud of yourself.

You hit a few minor snags here and there, but you were able to get out of them alright.

Congratulations on a well-played game.

xMenace

Nd5 was premature. Develop pieces. I'd look at h3 and g4 to drive the B back and use them as my main attack at his King.

Very iffy Bishop sac.

67 f4 is drawn, but it would make your opponent have to think how to handle a Q vs Q & pawn endgame. Decent winning chances against a newer player.

Riemens

You played a good game. I think your opponent could have played a better game and but even with a bishop behind, you almost had a winning game (wel done!)

A bit more luck in your endgame next time and you have your first winning game!

hmcgrier

Good game!

I think 49 Rc4...Kb5 50 Rxc8 would have been better in that position.

jwhitesj

Yeah the way I handled the outside passed pawns was horrible.  I ran it through chessmasters engine when I got a lot of yikes and ouches.

jwhitesj

junelorena wrote:

since you are in curious of your opening, the tempo should be watch for. 6.Ne3 would be a good move, developing with threats.


 I like that idea.

Funandnice

Good Game