Hey guys, this game was geniusly played on both sides. Reep vs. June. How about we settle this all with another game? A rematch?
My opponent got so lucky!
Sort:
Maybe another daily and send us all the code?
I'm not saying it wasn't brilliancy, but, but it would be fun to see you two again. After all, this one was more of a tie. And if you both believe your better, Reepicheep14 and Junebug444, why would you be scared of a rematch? Because there's ALWAYS room for improvement.
Kwolverine04 wrote:
I'm not saying it wasn't brilliancy, but, but it would be fun to see you two again. After all, this one was more of a tie. And if you both believe your better, Reepicheep14 and Junebug444, why would you be scared of a rematch? Because there's ALWAYS room for improvement.
Wise man......he has a wonderful point! Of course I would be willing to rematch. With our skills having improved over the months, I'm sure our games will be beyond perfection!
Than good luck to the both of you!! I only hope Reepicheep14 agrees.
Nice. I was looking at your game, but I don’t think it can beat MINE versus BobbyPhisher960 (ongoing). :)
Why not 22. Bxd8?
This game was reeally bad, I don't have any idea why you think it is your best. Both of you were very lucky that you didn't get mated early.
lubricant wrote:
there's no luck in chess. your a dumb troll. I hope you drown.
that's just rude. We all can agree this was a terrible game, but that is unnecessary.
14.Qh5+ followed by mate, 15.Bf7#, 22.Bxd8 and 26.Na7# were chances where white could have won, whereas g1=Q and a1=Q were chances where black could have won. Reep, touchdowns don't give you anything. I wonder how the moves are so bad despite being a daily game and how white didn't get checkmated early. You thought 15.Bf7# was a forfeit, Reep? See https;//www.chess.com/live/game/3866985920 and think again. You nearly lost in the endgame and only drew because your opponent accidentally underpromoted. Points aren't everything and you can't do king sacrifices. I wonder if you were surprised you couldn't do the king sac. You don't need touchdowns to checkmate and Junebug analysis and Junebug was way better. Try to win the exchange and Reep, your first 3 moves would only work if it was King of the Hill. If you like developing kings and random openings, play King of the Hill or Fischerandom(Chess960). Your exclamation points are rather blunders, and YOU were the one who got lucky, not Junebug. Why don't you two play a rematch? It was officially a draw by insufficient checkmating material. That's about it.
That's about it.
looks like both players have planned to troll us
ChessBoy513 wrote:
14.Qh5+ followed by mate, 15.Bf7#, 22.Bxd8 and 26.Na7# were chances where white could have won, whereas g1=Q and a1=Q were chances where black could have won. Reep, touchdowns don't give you anything. I wonder how the moves are so bad despite being a daily game and how white didn't get checkmated early. You thought 15.Bf7# was a forfeit, Reep? See https;//www.chess.com/live/game/3866985920 and think again. You nearly lost in the endgame and only drew because your opponent accidentally underpromoted. Points aren't everything and you can't do king sacrifices. I wonder if you were surprised you couldn't do the king sac. You don't need touchdowns to checkmate and Junebug analysis and Junebug was way better. Try to win the exchange and Reep, your first 3 moves would only work if it was King of the Hill. If you like developing kings and random openings, play King of the Hill or Fischerandom(Chess960). Your exclamation points are rather blunders, and YOU were the one who got lucky, not Junebug. Why don't you two play a rematch? It was officially a draw by insufficient checkmating material. That's about it.
Stated it all, though I don't think even if it was king of the hill he would win, as Black can block the advance, develop, and checkmate.
Jul 18, 2019
0
#97
ChessBoy513 wrote:
14.Qh5+ followed by mate, 15.Bf7#, 22.Bxd8 and 26.Na7# were chances where white could have won, whereas g1=Q and a1=Q were chances where black could have won. Reep, touchdowns don't give you anything. I wonder how the moves are so bad despite being a daily game and how white didn't get checkmated early. You thought 15.Bf7# was a forfeit, Reep? See https;//www.chess.com/live/game/3866985920 and think again. You nearly lost in the endgame and only drew because your opponent accidentally underpromoted. Points aren't everything and you can't do king sacrifices. I wonder if you were surprised you couldn't do the king sac. You don't need touchdowns to checkmate and Junebug analysis and Junebug was way better. Try to win the exchange and Reep, your first 3 moves would only work if it was King of the Hill. If you like developing kings and random openings, play King of the Hill or Fischerandom(Chess960). Your exclamation points are rather blunders, and YOU were the one who got lucky, not Junebug. Why don't you two play a rematch? It was officially a draw by insufficient checkmating material. That's about it.
You just don't understand the way the game works and the deep strategy behind those moves.
I don't blame you. Not even Stockfish understands it.
If this game WAS King of the Hill, the score would be 0-1.
Jul 18, 2019
0
#99
Reepicheep14 wrote:
My opponent got so lucky to get a draw in this game. I was clearly winning; I was up +6 at the end, but the site said it was a draw from insufficient material.
Feels like this was an analysis, not a real game... just sayin'...
Reep, I might be wrong, but the following things are definietly right:
1. 15.Bf7# is NOT a forfeit.
2. You do NOT need touchdowns to checkmate.
3. You don't have anything to support your claims, while I have Stockfish to support me with the early checkmate controversy.
4.Try getting a titled player to support your claim because that should teach you Carlsen isn't with you.
5. You can't do king sacs.
6. Last of all, of course Carlsen(and me) won't understand it! Do you expect a grandmaster or an at least mediocre player(me) to understand a completely amateurish game?!
unfollowing