Opening accuracy of 4.5, get out of here! Aggro king

I played aggro with my king and the the game review didn't like it all!

So I watched a Booby Fischer video and thought I would have a bit of fun with the king. I actually think the King has great movement and attacking abilities, but ofc using him in an aggressive manner is very risky vs good players.

Got a 4.5 score for the opening, and 89.9 for the end game, seen that much disparity before?

The computer really didn't like how me or my opponent played, giving us both an elo for the game of 150 (we are both at 350ish)

I am sure this game is full of mistakes on both sides and the rating is fair, but it was fun, and this guy was the same ELO as me. I think my weird strat really confused him as he made some bad errors early on that my king took advantage of.

I have some other king games too. Anyone got any king tips? I might try a king dash next time.

This should be I guess the elo

true should have been

Black followed the opening principle centralize your pieces, they just focused on developing their king, and forgot about other pieces

It's quite bizarre that white lost the endgame where he was up a full rook.

If you randomly select any of my games. I come from behind and win like 65% of the time. I have won many games where they had a 7-9+ piece advantage.

My blunders in early game enrage me enough to become a lot stronger late game. Although funny, its something I need to fix.#

I probably won this due to me being a puzzle spammer. He didn't see the checkmate coming.

All I was thinking as I watched the game was "first down!" when the king crossed the center line to c4.

lmao what the hell

My king identifies as a queen in today's age.

What have I just witnessed

A king who fights his own battles!

But you know that it's incredibly bad, don't you?

In this game, for example, white played as bad as humanly possible, and somehow still got into a completely winning endgame. He had a super easy win even before his last move.

Did white win?