PLEASE REVIEW THIS GAME IT HAS BRILLIANT MOVE I WANNA SEE IT....

https://www.chess.com/game/live/137948201772?move=0

reviewed

I reviewed the game for you, here are the details:

For me it declares no brilliants, but I believe 'brilliants' are also based on elo.

Here's where it would likely be if you reviewed the game:

Brilliants are based on 'sacrifices that are good' knight to d5 was the best move in addition to 'sacrificing' the rook for a good tactic that works in 2 ways.

First if they take the rook you fork their queen (what you did in the game), but if they take the knight with the rook, you can take their rook on a8, forcing them to 'undo their threat' and retreat the bishop to b8 which wins material.

Nice move

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/138202807598?tab=analysis

please someone review this game it has 7 great moves, i wanna see them

"Great move" on this website simply means "the only move in a position that doesn't immediately make your position a lot worse." I once got five "great" moves in a row when my opponent was repeatedly checking me with their queen and I simply moved my king back and forth, ignoring the one square where I would immediately lose a rook to a fork (there were only two legal moves each time). So, don't get your hopes up.

https://gyazo.com/a196f5bdfa36f4854a030f8e8a123529Hi, your great moves were made in keeping your opponent in perpetual check to avoid a loss.