Post game analysis not accurate

Hey guys, why is there a very short post game analysis showing you just how many mistakes / blunders / missed wins you had in the game when it is almost always wrong.

like this:

If you run the full game report, the results are almost always different. I mean to the extent that the report states you made 3 blunders and in the end you have 0 or complete opposite...

Why to even have it if its so often so wrong?

Hi Bauch,

I suspect this happens because running a full game review analyzes the game at a deeper depth than the quick review feature. The quick review is designed to not tax your CPU too much, the tradeoff being a less accurate picture of how you played. I think its main purpose is to tell you if you made any super obvious blunders, so you can decide if you want to explore that more thoroughly with the game review. But I agree with you in that I wish the two would agree more often.

Best.

I'd not mind to tax my CPU a bit more to get more accurate results... (and I believe most of the other players as well).

It is not uncommon to get similar results as these - and even worse. How much such a review tells you about your game? Well nothing at all - in fact quite the opposite - it misleads you completely