An interesting game showing that you shouldn't resign after every blunder. I stuck with it, made a few decent moves and ending up turning it around. Check out the analysis notes for my thoughts on the game.
Sticking With It
Sort:
Study games of Wesley So. He likes to play these positions in his early games.
What's your defence against 1.e4 as black? If Sicilian Dragon then you should bookmark these materials: CLICK HERE
I'm not one for trading the bishop + Knight for Rook + Pawn although i have played this, I Feel as though it gives black the advantage. I think you got lucky with the win, But good game anyway.
I wouldn't say it was lucky, my opponent made a mistake, the same way that I made a mistake earlier in the game. Calling wins lucky is kind of evasive - doesn't really address who played good or bad and when. Thanks for the comment and for the compliment, though... I still wonder about the B+K for R+P trade.
there are principles and rules governing an exchange or trade of materials. some of them are subjective to the players involved in the given position, while most of it are objective and should not be broken! In your given situation, i agree that the trade is purely on your personal preference because in higer rated matches, those players try to maintain the tension in the board as long as they can while maneuvering around that tension to gain the advantage. judging your exchange strategy for 2 minor pieces vs. rook+pawn is not good when you play a higher rated player who knows a lot of piece coordination rather than just counting the equivalent points in a given exchange of materials!
princejher - I understand that players shouldn't exchange pieces while only considering points. My question about this exchange is whether the disruption of black's kingside is worth black's more active piece play. I'd like to see examples of games featuring this exchange that are fully played out (unlike the game here, which ended because of a blunder).