Fox wrote:
Well it was interesting, I'll give you that! :)
Thank you LOGOZAR for your analysis in #144. Another trophy is sent to you!!
And FOX, yes, INDEED, I try to play amazing games!! HUGS and a trophy for you!
The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !! 💥
Sort:
AGAIN!!!! AGAIN! AGAIN!!!
I LOST ON TIME BUT I HAD AN WINNING POSITION.
IN FACT, I WAS CRUSHING THE OPPONENT, BUT, AGAIN, THE CLOCK!!!!
UNFAIR !!! VERY UNFAIR!!!!
This is the game:
Oooops! 42. Bg8, Bd5 or Bxc4 wood hav dun it jus in time.
Nov 5, 2015
0
#145
MarcoBR444 wrote:
AGAIN!!!! AGAIN! AGAIN!!!
I LOST ON TIME BUT I HAD AN WINNING POSITION.
IN FACT, I WAS CRUSHING THE OPPONENT, BUT, AGAIN, THE CLOCK!!!!
UNFAIR !!! VERY UNFAIR!!!!
This is the game:
Sorry
iluvzmetuna wrote:
Oooops! 42. Bg8, Bd5 or Bxc4 wood hav dun it.
yes, now I see this missed checkmate, but the clock was near zero then I did not see it.
lalalalalawhat wrote:
was it played in a scif?
What is scif?
ASTONISHING GAME !!!
VERY FUNNY AND INTERESTING!! THE BOREDOM DOES NOT LIVE HERE!
A BEAUTIFUL CHECKMATE IN ONLY 32 MOVES.
ENJOY AND YES, I ACCEPT THE APPLAUSE AND THE TROPHIES!
BEAUTIFUL checkmate in only 18 moves !!!
No ECO where followed!! No influence by boring chess books!!
Simple chess played by feelling!
[COMMENT DELETED]
Why I like to play odd openings?
Because lots of opponents blunder when face strange games.
That what happened in the game below.
The opponent resigned in only 6 moves. I teased him to make a blunder!!
Nov 5, 2015
0
#152
That wasn't a strange opening, you actually played basically all the best moves and I probably would have played the exact same moves if I was playing white!
Stop doing all these weakening pawn moves in the opening trust me they dont help.
You were practically lost by move 5. And When you said it was 'equal' in the middlegame, a few accurate moves would have lead to you having to play perfect not to get crushed, the best you could get is a pawn down endgame with better pieces to the opponent. Please read all of my annotations and lines.
2000mushroom wrote:
That wasn't a strange opening, you actually played basically all the best moves and I probably would have played the exact same moves if I was playing white!
Thank you!! As you are rated +1700, I see your post as a compliment! GOOD!!
Two trophies sent to you! Hugs!
======================
a few minutes ago · Quote · #158
Stop doing all these weakening pawn moves in the opening trust me they dont help.
=========================
Again, very nice observations Logozar!!
I am trying to follow your advices about the pawns and minor pieces at the openings.
Thank you!!
More 2 trophies sent to you! HUGS!
AN IMMORTAL GAME !!!
A truly masterpiece of modern chess!!
A beautiful checkmate after have refuted a huge attack!!
I can see the cover of Chess Magazine:
2000mushroom wrote: Quote · #162
Yes, indeed. In 14 he missed a checkmate.
Nice analysis! Two trophies sent to you, thanks!!
Nov 6, 2015
0
#159
MarcoBR444 wrote:
AN IMMORTAL GAME !!!
A truly masterpiece of modern chess!!
A beautiful checkmate after have refuted a huge attack!!
I can see the cover of Chess Magazine:
Wow (Not at the game, just the fact that you made an announcement, and a magazine cover on it)!
When I first saw the title I was thinking, *It's probably the OP's own game*
I honestly think that this isn't even close to a brilliancy (let alone a "Masterpiece of modern chess"). Just so it doesn't seem like I am making a personal attack on you I will make a statement: My games are terrible and shouldn't be called a masterpiece.
You missed a few tactics in your game and your opponent missed checkmate, but afterall "Without error there can be no brilliancy" (Emmanuel Laskar).
If you want a masterpiece go look at Wei Yi's games (especially the one against Lazaro Bruzon). You should probably analyse your game and learn from it (that way one day you can actually play agame worthy of being called a masterpiece).
I don't know if you are just having some fun with this but if you are dead serious in calling this a masterpiece please learn some humility.
Sorry if I come off as mean but thats just what I think (You should take this game as something to learn from than call it a masterpiece).
Have a nice day 
GMrisingJCLmember1 wrote
Wow (Not at the game, just the fact that you made an announcement, and a magazine cover on it)!
When I first saw the title I was thinking, *It's probably the OP's own game*
I honestly think that this isn't even close to a brilliancy (let alone a "Masterpiece of modern chess"). Just so it doesn't seem like I am making a personal attack on you I will make a statement: My games are terrible and shouldn't be called a masterpiece.
You missed a few tactics in your game and your opponent missed checkmate, but afterall "Without error there can be no brilliancy" (Emmanuel Laskar).
If you want a masterpiece go look at Wei Yi's games (especially the one against Lazaro Bruzon). You should probably analyse your game and learn from it (that way one day you can actually play agame worthy of being called a masterpiece).
I don't know if you are just having some fun with this but if you are dead serious in calling this a masterpiece please learn some humility.
Sorry if I come off as mean but thats just what I think (You should take this game as something to learn from than call it a masterpiece).
Have a nice day
That is ok, pal, your comments and analysis are welcome. The reason is I enjoy my victories on chess; it is really fun for me.
Thanks for the comments; I sent you 2 trophies! HUGS !!
Well it was interesting, I'll give you that! :)