We need more amateurs to post their annotated games.


  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1501

    Yereslov

    Here is a game that shows chess blindness at work, and why it's sometimes best to just play on impulse, rather than theory.


    I think it's fair to show both your good and bad games.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1502

    Yereslov

    DrSpudnik wrote:

    Move 2 looked like a weakie IMO.

    You mean the Phillidor Defense? Yes, it's well regarded as a weak defense, but, when you're playing against players who depend on opening theory for a good game, it's very effective.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1503

    Yereslov

    I would rather show my tournment games, but I rarely play OTB and I always get nervous and hesitant whenever I participate in large events.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1504

    DrSpudnik

    Yereslov wrote:
    DrSpudnik wrote:

    Move 2 looked like a weakie IMO.

    You mean the Phillidor Defense? Yes, it's well regarded as a weak defense, but, when you're playing against players who depend on opening theory for a good game, it's very effective.

    Philidor's reversed? 1. e4 e5 2. d3? is a great way to throw away the initiative and twiddle pieces around pointlessly. sad.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1505

    Yereslov

    Black is already losing the initiative by replying to white's choices. 

    I didn't play it because I considered it a good move, I played it because no one studies it, and because the typical Two Knights Defense was starting to get too boring.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1506

    EliasAStern

    my first tournament. posted this in the forum but didnt get any response. let me know if you have any advice. thanks!






  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1507

    PortlandPatzer

    Not much to say on the games but I completely forgot about our chess club here. Ususally I play at Coffee Time and PCH.

    If you want to play some games against other players in and from Portland here, search for the group: Portland, Oregon. We would love to have you there.

    Nice playing though in the rounds. You seem to have a good understnding of tactics and positional play. I might suggest focusing on those two areas as I did not get to see any endgame play in your games (though it never hurts to continue to practice in those areas).

    Best of luck in further games.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1508

    Yereslov

    EliasAStern wrote:

    my first tournament. posted this in the forum but didnt get any response. let me know if you have any advice. thanks!

     
     
     
     






    You shouldn't post four games all in one post. It's too confusing and too hard to organize.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1509

    MSC157

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1510

    Yereslov

    MSC157 wrote:
     

    I played white, 10|5, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgOijcEDPbI

    Why is your rating 2180 here and 1500 in real life?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1511

    DrSpudnik

    Real life ain't all it's cracked up to be.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1512

    MSC157

    No, I have no rating yet. And the game is result of 3-4 hours of sleeping. Total crap! :D

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1513

    Yereslov

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1514

    Vyomo

    Yereslov's analysis is really good, but I would like to suggest alternatives to the mistakes made. 

    18 Bb5? is a mistake. Looking at the position, it is clear that the Black bishop on g7 holds the kingside together and that the knight on d4 is far more effective than the knight on e2, so why not trade?

    Also, in the endgame, Rg5? is a mistake by black, Rf3! wins 

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1515

    MSC157

    Thanks for analysis. I continued the play because black is short on time, as you can see on the video. @Vyomo, "red line" is very interesting, I totally missed 24.Rc7, that's the reason I didn't play RxQ.
    47...Rc3+?? was actually Rc2, but black dropped the piece on c3 and then quickly moved it again to c2. 
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgOijcEDPbI
    It is marked in the comment of the video! ;) 

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1516

    PortlandPatzer

    Vyomo makes some very valid points in his analysis. These type of positions are exactly why I try to stay away from the Grunfeld systems if possible. My attacking game is far lower than my positional game but I always appreciate watching people play the opening on both sides of the board.

    My only win with the Grunfeld came about 10 months ago in a thematic tournament where I played 4. Bg5 (Taimanov Variation) and I was blown away at how much attacking was able to be done. i barely got out of the game with a win but yeah, great match regardless Miha. Keep it up.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1517

    MSC157

    Tnx, I will, the next game will come on Friday (or maybe Saturday) :)

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1518

    Yereslov

    This is a terrible game on my part.

     
    This game is funny. It was meant to be a twenty minute game, but I only played five minutes of that time format. My opponent only had a few seconds.



  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1519

    PortlandPatzer

    Yereslov wrote:

    This is a terrible game on my part.

     
     
    This game is funny. It was meant to be a twenty minute game, but I only played five minutes of that time format. My opponent only had a few seconds.



    18... e4 places White in a position similar to a Neo-Grunfeld position. 6. c5?! is dubious as in this line, Black not only has no worries of cxd5 giving White a big center, but allows the eventual ...e5 move, weakening d4 permanently. This Black move was typically played by Kasparov with the Black pieces to good success. However against Deep Fritz in the man vx. machine tournament, Kasparov played c5 as White even though in preparation the programmers had entered all his annotated games. About 15 moves later, he plays Kh1 after 0-0 and causes the computer to analyze the position for 30 minutes, with the game eventually ending in a draw.

    For an idea of play occuring with the e4 push as black, look back several pages at the game between ZekesGhost and Vengence69 which was a winning position for Black and see how the board looked after Black plays e4. All of Whites pieces are bogged down with no counterplay activities (disregard everything following about move 20 forward).

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1520

    blowerd

     

    It would be good if someone can analyise this for me.  Fairly detailed commentry is given in the game. BTW I am black in this game hence I have flipped the board over. 


Back to Top

Post your reply: