no I don't think that !! sorry .
because there is no tactics !!!
I thought both of you played well but Kenji made some poor decisions concerning the endgame. Although to be fair, I get the feeling he was trying to win because of the difference in ratings. Trying to win a drawn endgame is a good way to loose.
Aparently black is afraid of the bishop pair, and decides to play Bb4 opting to have his knight vs light square bishop for minor pieces in the endgame. Although the resulting minor pieces and structure favor white, this is not enough to win by any means. However, besides trading off a pair of redundant rooks, any further evolution of this endgame will favor white. The pure pawn endgame of course, the B vs N too. The R vs R will depend on how active each king has gotten but black's pawns arn't helping him here either.
Even though any GM could draw this blindfolded, I'd be afraid of slipping up and have played Nf6 instead.
It's hard to see how black could have improved while getting to this position. Getting the knight on g3 was nice (plugging e4 and looking at Nf5-e3) but 24...Re8 was bad allowing the immediate d5 and white's king comes into the queenside. In the diagram, white is definitely winning, but black's next move is the same as resigning. Re8? By trading off the rooks black has lost any hope of avoiding a loss.
Here white can win just about any way he chooses. Not only is he up material, but black's king and knight couldn't be much worse. I'm looking at Bc4-g8 to get behind the pawn chain and destory black's kingside.
Congrats on your 400 pt upset
Atleast for me it is my best win. OFcourse both did blunders but in this game i really tormented knight as hell.hope you enjoy!it was long game. you can argue why i was giving so much importance to opponent knight but i thought it is better to not involve his knight when i have choice. Instead i could have concentrated more on my pawns promotion but why make life more difficult?I hope you agree with me