check it out...I wanna know if it's okay...tried to create a sort of game hunt..dunno how it turned out..
I beat the computer level 10!!!
Sort:
Aug 25, 2020
0
#24
moonshadow1 wrote:
Your a real pro
you're*
and didn't you know he press "hint" on every single move?
Aug 25, 2020
0
#25
dennis9989 wrote:
What do you mean, @AliaraAD?
1800s struggle to beat level 8 and 9, so I'm pretty sure you cheated
@why-does-we-exsist.
He is right that 1800's struggle with the level 8's and 9's, so beating level 10 is something crazy. But for an 887 that is impossible, even if the 2600 computer was just playing innaccuracies. Btw no offense my friend, it probably would still beat me if it was making innaccuracies the whole game too for a 2600 computer.
But among this I don't find the level 8 to difficult when focused, but level 9 is a true challenge, whoever can beat the level 9 consistently is probably a master...
TeacherOfPain wrote:
@why-does-we-exsist.
He is right that 1800's struggle with the level 8's and 9's, so beating level 10 is something crazy. But for an 887 that is impossible, even if the 2600 computer was just playing innaccuracies. Btw no offense my friend, it probably would still beat me if it was making innaccuracies the whole game too for a 2600 computer.
But among this I don't find the level 8 to difficult when focused, but level 9 is a true challenge, whoever can beat the level 9 consistently is probably a master...
I'm on my way to 2000 OTB and I can't even beat level 7 consistently. I might win 2 games in a row but I can lose 5 games after that. I have to give the OP the benefit of the doubt and assume he/she created this thread as a lark, otherwise they are seriously delusional.
dennis9989 写道:
This is my secret: Don't worry about time. Use as much time as possible so you could think wisely. I often need to think 3 seconds in the starting point (since I am a master at openings), and the computer often plays Italian Game, Queen's Pawn Opening and stuff that is very normal. But surprisingly, I need to spend about 12 seconds per move.
so... I used stock fish to play against it and drawn...either you are cheating or you are a never seen before master that can beat Magnus Carlson which I don’t think is going to happen seeing your rating...
Aug 26, 2020
0
#30
dennis9989 wrote:
This is my secret: Don't worry about time. Use as much time as possible so you could think wisely. I often need to think 3 seconds in the starting point (since I am a master at openings), and the computer often plays Italian Game, Queen's Pawn Opening and stuff that is very normal. But surprisingly, I need to spend about 12 seconds per move.
ah yes, your secret
Aug 26, 2020
0
#31
dennis9989 wrote:
And this link might find you interesting: discord.com/invite/wfAaemE
We are trying to gather people to go to this discord. In it, we could share chess things together, which I will find helpful. Thank you if you joined it!
(Discord is a group-chatting platform originally built for gamers, like chess, but which has since become a general use platform for users with questions. It does not mean 'disagree' in this place.
joineded
Well @dennis9989,
Of course you couldn't have won fair and square, even Super GM's and GM's would have a tough time with that computer as it is 2600 strength. However in this knowledge it is cool that you had the experience to win with it with the hints or some type of engine, however brodcasting this is not wise since your rating doesn't match anywhere near level 10, even let alone level 5.
So I hope you have a successsful chess journey and I do truly hope the best! However spreading news like this makes you look more folly than authentic and makes you look bad on the forums. Just saying...
No offense of course, just want to get that point accross, saying these things are not productive, that's all.
dennis9989 wrote:
This is my secret: Don't worry about time. Use as much time as possible so you could think wisely. I often need to think 3 seconds in the starting point (since I am a master at openings), and the computer often plays Italian Game, Queen's Pawn Opening and stuff that is very normal. But surprisingly, I need to spend about 12 seconds per move.
How can you be 1300 and yet beat Level 10? I still doubt it. You need to show us a screen shot of you beating the computer, otherwise, your claim seems false.
Feb 12, 2021
0
#34
The evil of chess is to rejoice in beating a computer and not a human being.
Sad time.
dennis9989 写道:
Hello, I played this on iPad, and Level 10 is only rated, like, 1800 or 1900. Maybe it is just a misunderstanding. Sorry, but I beat computer level 10, but I don't have a picture beating it.
Fun fact
it is rated like 3000 on chess com and 2850 fide boi even top gms cannot beat it
just admit that is not a game between you and the level 10 computer
No, it is the level 10 computer.
I beat microsoft's chess titan lvl 10 comp
QUite ez actually. I'd rate it as 2000 in blitz
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/can-u-guess-this-game-u-gotta-1st-discover-this-game-n-to-discover-it-u-gotta-1st-solve-it#comment-51911920