Noob
1000 Rating
Sort:
Noob lol? Your opinion is irrelevant you barely ever played classical and your a bullet player..Imagine calling someone noob knowing that fact.
No one plays like carlsen and dubov. Don't rely on accuracy of chess.com. yes i don't play rapid cause it's time taking, but I'm ready to take any challenge
I think @xkenzenx is right. Yes, they play all the time stronger and even though I am a great player myself, a lot of them are some how too good for their rating.
In your most recent game you played 1. a4.
Then you continued to develop none of your pieces for seven moves.
I don't think the problem is other people playing with above-rating accuracy, but that you haven't yet learnt the basics of the game.
Try to develop your pieces and play solidly rather than so many pawn moves. I didn't view the game beyond the opening, so perhaps I have too small of a sample size of your games to comment, but if you play like that in every game then you aren't setting yourself up to win.
See noob
None Magnus
Apr 3, 2021
0
#11
I wondered the same thing at 900, then I realized that they were terrible and I just had to get good.
Now at 1500 I realize that even 1700 rated players make basic mistakes.
Two separate 1700 players I played blundered there rook to a simple tactic.
And the funny thing is I still lost both of those games.
These players that never blunder, are making mistakes all the time, you just aren’t realizing.
Look at free lectures on positional play, study endgames, do many tactics puzzles, and grind.
That is all I did to break into the intermediate rating range that I’m currently at.
Now at 1500 I realize that even 1700 rated players make basic mistakes.
Two separate 1700 players I played blundered there rook to a simple tactic.
And the funny thing is I still lost both of those games.
These players that never blunder, are making mistakes all the time, you just aren’t realizing.
Look at free lectures on positional play, study endgames, do many tactics puzzles, and grind.
That is all I did to break into the intermediate rating range that I’m currently at.
Same issue here, I am playing chess for 2 months and Im getting opponents with same ELO but with 5+ years experience with chess, so frustrating..... How the hell im supposted to improve my skill If i can not play against players on same rank.....
Ánimo crack
Apr 3, 2021
0
#14
Slimbador wrote:
Same issue here, I am playing chess for 2 months and Im getting opponents with same ELO but with 5+ years experience with chess, so frustrating..... How the hell im supposted to improve my skill If i can not play against players on same rank.....
experience doesn't count in chess. What counts is how well you play. Most people can play for years and never be good.
Apr 3, 2021
0
#15
TheOneTrueJoe2 wrote:
In your most recent game you played 1. a4.
Then you continued to develop none of your pieces for seven moves.
Well, looks like we found the problem.
Gonna give a tip, just start with e4 and bring out your knights. Slowly develop your pieces. Please do NOT start with a4
Apr 3, 2021
0
#17
Tortillabibimbap wrote:
I think @xkenzenx is right. Yes, they play all the time stronger and even though I am a great player myself, a lot of them are some how too good for their rating.
dont be too narcissistic, you only have a 600 in blitz of all things
Apr 3, 2021
0
#18
one of your games
i think the reason you're losing is not that your opponents aren't blundering, it's that you're blundering. this guy isnt playing like Dubov or Carlsen, he's just taking advantage of your sub-par moves
Apr 3, 2021
0
#20
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
one of your games
i think the reason you're losing is not that your opponents aren't blundering, it's that you're blundering. this guy isnt playing like Dubov or Carlsen, he's just taking advantage of your sub-par moves
yea, i play like crap, and im dropping rating, but honestly, i agree with @dababyssideting
I know it's not the most calm and polite way to say it but, how the [removed -- MS] i'm suppose to win a [removed] game if my opponents never blunder... I'm at 1000 rating and people play like they're Dubov or Carlsen or some. What is this rating, 1000 player should be absolutely terrible, considering the Gm is 2500 minimum. And yet I get spanked by some players that never blunder the entire games. Seriously i'm infuriating right now almost smash my mouse in half.Even on tight game they nail the perfect route to win this is beyond frustrating... Rating doesnt mean anything on this site.....