1100 CRUSHES 1800 in Complete Domination!!

I said, in a previous post, that the 1100 rating barrier was one of the toughest to break through.

I still believe this. 

However, once you're past the 1100 plateau, everything gets easier, and you can suddenly even defeat 1800 players. Chess.com Daily ratings, of course. 

Check out this game:

Everything I did, every move I made, was just a struggle to survive against the player rated almost 700 points higher. But somehow I did, and I managed to even get the advantage, and soon my opponent gave up.

^That's what I thought! Incredible. 

In my opinion, 29... h5 was a very poor move. It opened up the kingside, which you later took advantage of.

Sure... "vacation"...

Very much equal with no mistakes through 28 moves

29. h4 ?

29. h4 Nf6 and Black gets the best of things after exchange of Rooks.

Complete domination. ? Hardly, except for the trolling title once again showing me you don't really respect the game nor your opponent.

Everyone knows you sported a 2000+ rating prior to your fair play infractions. Are you going to disrespect all your opponents who in fact are lower rated than you ?

Boring. You should have lost that game after 29. h4 a clear mistake.

BS you're 1100. You exhibit zero respect for your opponent with the charade.

You were over 2100. Now you're mocking an 1800 player who played quite well.

h4 is actually a fine move. Aiming to play h5, it breaks up the king structure pretty well. Nf6 does defend this threat pretty well, but this may invite White to play g4 and h5 since there are still plenty of pieces on the board. Thus, this more or less forced the opponent to play h5, which, as said earlier, is a pretty poor move. However, looking at between h5 and just letting the h-file become open, I would choose the latter. Yet, I do agree with the fact there should be some respect to the opponent, since he has a lot of games running, thus meaning that he probably didn't pay all that much attention to this game.

@DeepFlight12

He is over 2100 in his Bullet rating, not his Daily.

Nope. His daily rating was 2100 but a few weeks ago. He got sacked 1000 points for fair play infractions.

It is a fair play infraction to create multiple accounts and play games vs those accounts. This was by your own admission and apology.

And that is why you don't have FIVE HUNDRED GAMES going at once.

Cherub_Enjel wrote:

Fair play infractions? What fair play infractions? I did something far less serious. Also, don't take away from my amazing victory. It's not every day that a player can beat someone 700 points higher.

We're you or were you not 2100 + before the games were shut down and timed out? 2nd. You were not sanctioned because of the amount of games being played. That's nonsense.