The most I've ever beaten was 5 (!) but obviously that involved a lot of luck... people losing their queen and immediately resigning, that sort of thing.
I'd like to see people rated higher than me do better... I feel like 3 is definitely my limit when the games go this long, but I'm sure other people could do more... would love to see @danielnaroditsky or others blast tons of people.
Maybe @GYG could do 4 or 5, I don't know.
Where did u conduct this simul?
I just opened 3 lichess tabs, that's all. So the opponents are totally random... one reason it took many tries is some people play 3 moves then leave the game, stuff like that... so yeah, random lichess opponents.
I'm using the keyboard to cycle through the tabs.
And as I tried more, instead of playing interesting openings I resorted to the simple stuff you see... and even then I almost lost on time in 2 of the games... like I said, harder than it looks. You need some luck.
Anonymous unrated games.
The fact that I could beat all 3 means the ratings weren't high.
So I'm only good enough to beat morons? 😢
But yeah, anyone who wants to do that or better give it a try... it was harder than I thought it'd be.
Maybe @GYG could do 4 or 5, I don't know.
Sounds like fun, I'll give it a try later today
Wow, this is impressive. I would lose on like move two of each game or something pathetic like that 🤣🤣
Maybe @GYG could do 4 or 5, I don't know.
Sounds like fun, I'll give it a try later today
Since you're more aggressive you may also have a better style for it?
I'm not sure.
Just did 4 games on my first try, move lengths were 23, 37, 45, 49. In a sec I'll upload it as an unlisted youtube video like yours.
Nice.
My first try was also 4 games, but was 3 wins and a loss 
But yeah, your total move number was really good, 154.
Makes me wonder how many Hikaru or Naroditsky could do. I'm sure they'd be moving too fast for me to understand what's going on.
It's also... how to put it...
When an 800 rated player watches Hikaru play a 3000 rated player, they don't understand how good he is... I mean, I don't understand either of course. Most of the moves just look normal right?
But if you saw him beat, I don't know, 10 people like this, even a beginner could appreciate how ridiculous that is.
Which is to say, I think this is an interesting format... I looked at the normal simuls on lichess, and it seems the simul giver gets a lot of extra time... ok, sure, that makes sense, but it's kinda boring. I saw an IM beat 10 people in 5 + 0... but they started with 25 or 30 minutes, so that's kind of stupid IMO... obviously the IM will win every game.
here you go. I was saved by multiple miracles and the quality of play was beyond embarassing, but I got the results in the end. I might attempt 5 or 6 later today
Which is to say, I think this is an interesting format...
definitely, I can see myself getting addicted to it
here you go. I was saved by multiple miracles and the quality of play was beyond embarassing, but I got the results in the end. I might attempt 5 or 6 later today
Awesome, great job.
You had over 150 moves, I think that's really good.
Last 2 games:
6 seconds vs over a minute then into 6 seconds vs half a minute!
Fun isn't it 
Harder than it looks... took many tries to get 3 games where:
1) I didn't lose or draw
2) Opponent didn't lose or quit in the first 20 moves
PNG so you don't get a headache watching the video... but video is my POV
-
-
-