3 brilliants in a row!!!
Sort:
16 hrs ago
0
#3
I sacced two different rooks in the same game, didn't even get a great move, never mind a brilliancy.
But congrats on the stalemate trick, Eric Rosen would be proud.
So it was the mad rook
Awesome stalemate trick! That guy must have been so mad about the draw.
I can’t see it
15 hrs ago
0
#9
#6, the first rook sacrifice was brilliant, but the second was not, because you were already winning.
14 hrs ago
0
#12
Pointing out that draw was available as early as move 50.
Just RxBch instead of Rc3.
Your rook then just shuttles from e3 to e2 to e1 with perpetual check.
Stockfish seems to confirm it.
22 min ago
0
#14
Fetoxo wrote:
@playerafar, I know. Did you read my text? "I didn't find it inmediately".
Yes. But i commented further.
That game also had its salient points.
One was how your opponent used his extra piece.
He chose to keep it advanced instead of using its distance feature from further back.
He didn't demonstrate ability to play a piece up.
You simply got to shuttle your rook back and forth.
He improved his pawns instead of his King and pieces.
-----------
But you deserve credit for hanging in there.
I was black. I know I made some horrible mistakes in the middlegame, but I found this brilliant way to draw the game! I didn't find it inmediately though, but still! I don't know how the algorythm chooses which moves are brilliant and which are not, because it didn't mark all of them as brilliant. I marked all of the moves brilliant which the system showed brilliant, and I also marked my blunder.
