Andrew Tate a Chess Champion?

Sort:
Sticklight0609

my problem with andrew tate's fans is how they say "top g". I feel like murdering someone everytime i hear that word....It's so annoying to listen to
Andrew tate will say some basic things and then say misyognistic HYPOCRITICAL things like women with high body counts are sl^ts but then he'll take pictures with the same type of women twerking on camera. He even has a course on how to get promiscuous women or whatever.
He also brags about having a high body count but apparently if women have high body counts they are disgusting. Look, I personally won't like someone with a very high body count, but then I'm not hypocritical about it and dont have double standards like him
He will say something mysoginistic and then say basic htigns like "women are the most precious things in the world", and his brainwashed robotic fans will use those lines to defend him
If you have more than 10 braincells you'll identify his tactics and scams he uses to get rich and get clout. If you're dumb or have genetic brain issues you wont be able to identify those patterns 
If you have the ability to question things and consider that you could be wrong, you'll be able to see he's right in some cases but his whole personality has been structured to gain fame, money, scams, popularity, hate and clout. He says basic things like dont do drugs and vape, he smokes  a cigar, he then says absolute stupid things and literally admitted to have moved to romania for their LESS HARSH LAWS WHEN IT COMES TO SEXUAL HARRASSMENT. Now when he's in trouble he complains about the corruption
he also mentioend how he makes use of the corruption and all in the government. you can find all these things online none of what i said is made up
you're welcome to prove me wrong, i'm always up for a debate, unless its with someone who wants to attack my character instead of my logic

David
Faraday_mate wrote:
Wolfbird wrote:

Excellent article, David. Thanks for posting.

Andrew Tate is a cancer on society and too many young men have been brainwashed into thinking this is what it means to be a man. The psychological control he wields is sad and appalling. 

Honesty. Tate is better than any politician or journalist. He knows what he wants and isn't afraid to speak his mind.

That article(assuming they didn't completely made up those stories) has zero substance.

There’s bad and biased journalism and then there’s well researched and well told journalism and this is the latter. This journalist has put in the legwork - he’s made the calls and visited the places and spoken to people. It’s got plenty of “substance”, far more than any of Tate’s claims to wealth.

FunctionalChaos
David wrote:
Faraday_mate wrote:
Wolfbird wrote:

Excellent article, David. Thanks for posting.

Andrew Tate is a cancer on society and too many young men have been brainwashed into thinking this is what it means to be a man. The psychological control he wields is sad and appalling. 

Honesty. Tate is better than any politician or journalist. He knows what he wants and isn't afraid to speak his mind.

That article(assuming they didn't completely made up those stories) has zero substance.

There’s bad and biased journalism and then there’s well researched and well told journalism and this is the latter. This journalist has put in the legwork - he’s made the calls and visited the places and spoken to people. It’s got plenty of “substance”, far more than any of Tate’s claims to wealth.

 

Yes, but have you considered that Faraday_mate doesn't WANT to believe that?  He's formed an opinion on Andrew Tate and it sucks to feel like you formed a wrong opinion, so it's much easier to just refuse to acknowledge any evidence counter to your already formed opinion.  Then you never have to change your opinion or feel like you make mistakes!

pasoflashback

very good

ErnestoCampoverde
Faraday_mate escribió:

I don't care, nor do I like the guy. But what I see is a person that says "look at me, I am rich, famous, I have influence, you can be that too". Most other celebrities and billionaires do the exact opposite. They live in their mansions with private jets and security while fearmongering, telling their followers to live more sparingly, to have less children, eat ze bugs etc.

That, to me is even less likable and we don't care how much "philanthropy" they do to feel better about themselves. To stay on topic, Tate is a good chess player, his father was a known IM. 

 

"It was written we should be loyal to the nightmare of our choice." - Joseph Conrad

 

The fact that he says "look at me, I am rich, famous, I have influence, you can be that too" as a way of scamming people into giving him money is not something I'd consider admirable. It's like the people selling 'get rich quick' books, where they are the only ones getting rich by selling these books, not because of their content. 

DiogenesDue
Faraday_mate wrote:

I don't care, nor do I like the guy. But what I see is a person that says "look at me, I am rich, famous, I have influence, you can be that too". Most other celebrities and billionaires do the exact opposite. They live in their mansions with private jets and security while fearmongering, telling their followers to live more sparingly, to have less children, eat ze bugs etc.

That, to me is even less likable and we don't care how much "philanthropy" they do to feel better about themselves. To stay on topic, Tate is a good chess player, his father was a known IM. 

"It was written we should be loyal to the nightmare of our choice." - Joseph Conrad

Emory Tate was not just a good chess player, he was in the US Air Force and he would be turning in his grave to see how his sons are acting now...

Wolfbird
Faraday_mate wrote:

I don't care, nor do I like the guy. But what I see is a person that says "look at me, I am rich, famous, I have influence, you can be that too". Most other celebrities and billionaires do the exact opposite. They live in their mansions with private jets and security while fearmongering, telling their followers to live more sparingly, to have less children, eat ze bugs etc.

That, to me is even less likable and we don't care how much "philanthropy" they do to feel better about themselves. To stay on topic, Tate is a good chess player, his father was a known IM. 

 

"It was written we should be loyal to the nightmare of our choice." - Joseph Conrad

You're not being honest here. You like him and admire him, regardless of how he made his money, which is through corruption, abuse and deceit. If you didn't like and admire him, you would not be making excuses for him. If you really didn't care, you would not be defending him. 

Faraday_mate
Wolfbird wrote:
Faraday_mate wrote:

I don't care, nor do I like the guy. But what I see is a person that says "look at me, I am rich, famous, I have influence, you can be that too". Most other celebrities and billionaires do the exact opposite. They live in their mansions with private jets and security while fearmongering, telling their followers to live more sparingly, to have less children, eat ze bugs etc.

That, to me is even less likable and we don't care how much "philanthropy" they do to feel better about themselves. To stay on topic, Tate is a good chess player, his father was a known IM. 

 

"It was written we should be loyal to the nightmare of our choice." - Joseph Conrad

You're not being honest here. You like him and admire him, regardless of how he made his money, which is through corruption, abuse and deceit. If you didn't like and admire him, you would not be making excuses for him. If you really didn't care, you would not be defending him. 

Perhaps we simply do not hast aught better to do than post  'i  these forums, officer. 'tis not a court hearing.  Many argue for divers reasons.

actual_knight_gaming
Faraday_mate wrote:
Wolfbird wrote:
Faraday_mate wrote:

I don't care, nor do I like the guy. But what I see is a person that says "look at me, I am rich, famous, I have influence, you can be that too". Most other celebrities and billionaires do the exact opposite. They live in their mansions with private jets and security while fearmongering, telling their followers to live more sparingly, to have less children, eat ze bugs etc.

That, to me is even less likable and we don't care how much "philanthropy" they do to feel better about themselves. To stay on topic, Tate is a good chess player, his father was a known IM. 

 

"It was written we should be loyal to the nightmare of our choice." - Joseph Conrad

You're not being honest here. You like him and admire him, regardless of how he made his money, which is through corruption, abuse and deceit. If you didn't like and admire him, you would not be making excuses for him. If you really didn't care, you would not be defending him. 

Perhaps we simply do not hast aught better to do than post  'i  these forums, officer. 'tis not a court hearing.  Many argue for divers reasons.

 

yes, like adding a png of a galactic horse helps your argument more than actually backing your argument up

MaetsNori
knight_gaming592 wrote:

yes, like adding a png of a galactic horse helps your argument more than actually backing your argument up

grin.png

I believe it's one of the characters from My Little Pony.

Faraday_mate
knight_gaming592 wrote:
Faraday_mate wrote:
Wolfbird wrote:
Faraday_mate wrote:

I don't care, nor do I like the guy. But what I see is a person that says "look at me, I am rich, famous, I have influence, you can be that too". Most other celebrities and billionaires do the exact opposite. They live in their mansions with private jets and security while fearmongering, telling their followers to live more sparingly, to have less children, eat ze bugs etc.

That, to me is even less likable and we don't care how much "philanthropy" they do to feel better about themselves. To stay on topic, Tate is a good chess player, his father was a known IM. 

 

"It was written we should be loyal to the nightmare of our choice." - Joseph Conrad

You're not being honest here. You like him and admire him, regardless of how he made his money, which is through corruption, abuse and deceit. If you didn't like and admire him, you would not be making excuses for him. If you really didn't care, you would not be defending him. 

Perhaps we simply do not hast aught better to do than post  'i  these forums, officer. 'tis not a court hearing.  Many argue for divers reasons.

 

yes, like adding a png of a galactic horse helps your argument more than actually backing your argument up

We quothed all's we wanted. Gōde Nihte.

MagnusCarlson202020212022
He cant beat Magnus, but is good
PlayByDay

Now now, being a brony is not criminal and will not cause anybody to end up in a Romanian jail. 

actual_knight_gaming
PlayByDay wrote:

Now now, being a brony is not criminal and will not cause anybody to end up in a Romanian jail. 

Nothing wrong with that, (whatever a "brony" is) I was just saying how the poster above me (forgot their name) didn't respond with a actual statement reinforcing their argument

TateMadeMeDoIt

Can someone without describing why they either like or dislike him tell me what his rating is and provide evidence for it, if not what is his expected rating I've read it might be 1600.

LastGunslinger1

you'll are nuts

Woollensock2
Y’all barmy ! ✌️😎
GodsCoelacanth
Woollensock2 wrote:
Y’all barmy ! ✌️😎

What da cat said!

bodington

.

BlueScreenRevenge
GreatBigWave wrote:

Christ is king.

Please keep your religion out of here. It is against posting rules of chess.com forums.