BULLET TAKES MORE SKILL THAN OTB CHESS

Sort:
snip3z
-kenpo- wrote:

you think I'm all bothered by your bullet chess nonsense. lmao. 

hey, you want some cake? I have cake.

you think i'm bothered by your desperation to please me with your cake? No. Since you did not deny that you're not mad, then obviously you are trying to divert from my question, and therefore resorted to this outrageous topic of cake. Just because the cake has burnt you along with your recent posts above, I suggest jumping into the artic ocean for a quick dip. 

VanillaKnightPOC

Haha no cake for you

VanillaKnightPOC

Devil food is delicious but it will go straight to your thighs.

snip3z
-kenpo- wrote:
Markle wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:
Markle wrote:
Sally_Ubatz wrote:

No I cannot.  These people need to toughen up.  It's the 21st century, brohans.  Things are speeding up.  Ever seen the "Real World" or "Jersey Shore" on MTV?  Those are the kinda people that can deal with the modern new age, bro. 

And I hear "DJ Pauly D" is a bullet chess masta.


 

    The two shows you mention along with all the other reality show crap they have on now shows just how worthless TV has become. Thse people are a bunch of talentless morons getting paid a lot of money for nothing.

blashpemy!!!!!!!!!!!

snooki is a genius markle.

it's high time you fully recognize how essential and important are these people to human society and civilization as a whole. 

 I think you may be confused on what is important to society, And as for Snooki you should probably replace the word genius with something that better describes her.One i can think of starts with s and rhymes with gut.

I certainly am not confused on this matter. it's clearly evident that these people that grace the screens of millions of televisions a week are mental giants who provoke the most profound discussions of our times. it is they that history will remember markle, not you. good day.

You sir, are deeply confused. You clearly aimed to not answer my question, and look at what you're stating now. "Mental giants, who provoke the most profound discussion of our times?" I was on the topic of bullet chess, and first you go off on a tangent trying to persuade me with your cake, and now going onto the matter of "mental giants" who will be remembered for the discussions of our time? Look at yourself, you are clearly responding to a person who is miles away from you in an argument on an online website. I never asked for your opinion yet you clearly responded to my thread, so before you go and startpointing fingers at  about history not remembering me, what about history remembering you? And back OT Bullet chess is clearly superior.

snip3z
-kenpo- wrote:
snip3z wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:

you think I'm all bothered by your bullet chess nonsense. lmao. 

hey, you want some cake? I have cake.

you think i'm bothered by your desperation to please me with your cake? No. Since you did not deny that you're not mad, then obviously you are trying to divert from my question, and therefore resorted to this outrageous topic of cake. Just because the cake has burnt you along with your recent posts above, I suggest jumping into the artic ocean for a quick dip. 

I have no idea what you are talking about little one.

you want some angel food or devils food?

Kiddo, you never answered my original question. Are you mad sonny jim? Becuase I believe ya mad.

snip3z
VanillaKnightPOC wrote:

Haha no cake for you

<3

snip3z
-kenpo- wrote:
snip3z wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:
snip3z wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:

you think I'm all bothered by your bullet chess nonsense. lmao. 

hey, you want some cake? I have cake.

you think i'm bothered by your desperation to please me with your cake? No. Since you did not deny that you're not mad, then obviously you are trying to divert from my question, and therefore resorted to this outrageous topic of cake. Just because the cake has burnt you along with your recent posts above, I suggest jumping into the artic ocean for a quick dip. 

I have no idea what you are talking about little one.

you want some angel food or devils food?

Kiddo, you never answered my original question. Are you mad sonny jim? Becuase I believe ya mad.

oh hogwash!!!

eat your cake and you will feel right as rain!!! I promise. 

gg

snip3z
-kenpo- wrote:
snip3z wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:
Markle wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:
Markle wrote:
Sally_Ubatz wrote:

No I cannot.  These people need to toughen up.  It's the 21st century, brohans.  Things are speeding up.  Ever seen the "Real World" or "Jersey Shore" on MTV?  Those are the kinda people that can deal with the modern new age, bro. 

And I hear "DJ Pauly D" is a bullet chess masta.


 

    The two shows you mention along with all the other reality show crap they have on now shows just how worthless TV has become. Thse people are a bunch of talentless morons getting paid a lot of money for nothing.

blashpemy!!!!!!!!!!!

snooki is a genius markle.

it's high time you fully recognize how essential and important are these people to human society and civilization as a whole. 

 I think you may be confused on what is important to society, And as for Snooki you should probably replace the word genius with something that better describes her.One i can think of starts with s and rhymes with gut.

I certainly am not confused on this matter. it's clearly evident that these people that grace the screens of millions of televisions a week are mental giants who provoke the most profound discussions of our times. it is they that history will remember markle, not you. good day.

You sir, are deeply confused. You clearly aimed to not answer my question, and look at what you're stating now. "Mental giants, who provoke the most profound discussion of our times?" I was on the topic of bullet chess, and first you go off on a tangent trying to persuade me with your cake, and now going onto the matter of "mental giants" who will be remembered for the discussions of our time? Look at yourself, you are clearly responding to a person who is miles away from you in an argument on an online website. I never asked for your opinion yet you clearly responded to my thread, so before you go and startpointing fingers at  about history not remembering me, what about history remembering you? And back OT Bullet chess is clearly superior.

I am merely trying to inform this person of the vital importance and intellectual significance of MTV's Jersey Shore and The Real World. I suggest you stop spreading disinformation and propaganda.

you clearly did not recognise the thread title, because if you did it will relate to Bullet Chess and not a sitcom. I ain't spreading anything, just stating that this thread is clear a bullet chess thread and you've gone off on a massive tangent, so stay OT.

Fear_ItseIf

dat chain quote

snip3z
pellik wrote:
snip3z wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:
snip3z wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:
Markle wrote:
-kenpo- wrote:
Markle wrote:
Sally_Ubatz wrote:

No I cannot.  These people need to toughen up.  It's the 21st century, brohans.  Things are speeding up.  Ever seen the "Real World" or "Jersey Shore" on MTV?  Those are the kinda people that can deal with the modern new age, bro. 

And I hear "DJ Pauly D" is a bullet chess masta.


 

    The two shows you mention along with all the other reality show crap they have on now shows just how worthless TV has become. Thse people are a bunch of talentless morons getting paid a lot of money for nothing.

blashpemy!!!!!!!!!!!

snooki is a genius markle.

it's high time you fully recognize how essential and important are these people to human society and civilization as a whole. 

 I think you may be confused on what is important to society, And as for Snooki you should probably replace the word genius with something that better describes her.One i can think of starts with s and rhymes with gut.

I certainly am not confused on this matter. it's clearly evident that these people that grace the screens of millions of televisions a week are mental giants who provoke the most profound discussions of our times. it is they that history will remember markle, not you. good day.

You sir, are deeply confused. You clearly aimed to not answer my question, and look at what you're stating now. "Mental giants, who provoke the most profound discussion of our times?" I was on the topic of bullet chess, and first you go off on a tangent trying to persuade me with your cake, and now going onto the matter of "mental giants" who will be remembered for the discussions of our time? Look at yourself, you are clearly responding to a person who is miles away from you in an argument on an online website. I never asked for your opinion yet you clearly responded to my thread, so before you go and startpointing fingers at  about history not remembering me, what about history remembering you? And back OT Bullet chess is clearly superior.

I am merely trying to inform this person of the vital importance and intellectual significance of MTV's Jersey Shore and The Real World. I suggest you stop spreading disinformation and propaganda.

you clearly did not recognise the thread title, because if you did it will relate to Bullet Chess and not a sitcom. I ain't spreading anything, just stating that this thread is clear a bullet chess thread and you've gone off on a massive tangent, so stay OT.

Jersey Shore and The Real World are as good an argument as any as to why bullet chess takes more skill then real chess. Sure they are clearly unrelated to the topic, but the argument is stupid anyway.

your input is invalid. Tyvm

TheOldReb

Its normal for strong chess players to play worse when they have less time . Some are very strong in blitz and bullet and others arent . When someone has lower and lower ratings in slower time controls than blitz and bullet it means they are likely a weak player but very fast . The only skill bullet online requires is the ability to make many moves very fast while avoiding mate at the same time . 

snip3z
Reb wrote:

Its normal for strong chess players to play worse when they have less time . Some are very strong in blitz and bullet and others arent . When someone has lower and lower ratings in slower time controls than blitz and bullet it means they are likely a weak player but very fast . The only skill bullet online requires is the ability to make many moves very fast while avoiding mate at the same time . 

you know your facts, but what if Chess.com is the site where one plays bullet on, yet there is another site where he may be 2400 blitz? ouchy

TheOldReb

Internet ratings are meaningless  , only otb ratings have any real indication of one's ability in chess. 

snip3z
Reb wrote:

Internet ratings are meaningless  , only otb ratings have any real indication of one's ability in chess. 

yes you're completely right, and I have a respectable otb rating. But as you said earlier that weak players move very fast and are good at that doesn't mean they aren't as strong otb. Some are equally as good at bullet as they are otb, so your statement is marginally flawed. THat's just my opinion though, and I respect yours for what it is.

snip3z

no ones given me a good reason to why OTB is more skilful than bullet yet

Fear_ItseIf

and the topic is still going....what can i say..

VanillaKnightPOC

In OTB you need patience, even the most absent minded should be able to focus for a bullet game.

Radical_Drift

Wow, snip3z, I think you get the Dr. Trollinsky award :P

Radical_Drift

However, I find that in bullet chess, there is a tendency to be less careful. I don't play bullet much anymore, but when I did, I could win with the most random moves.... OTB chess and even live standard chess require epic levels of concentration, which I and quite of a few people don't have every day.... But, I think you're gonna troll my comment like all the rest, so, go ahead! :P

Fear_ItseIf

lol