You have created a new opening?
Can users on chess.com publish their own openings
Yes I have, three actually, one of them is a variation of the other , and I have been getting great results from all three
Yes I have, three actually, one of them is a variation of the other , and I have been getting great results from all three
Don't post your games, they're trying to steal your novelty. Send the discovery to FIDE.
... so that you can let them steal it instead?
They're already corrupt enough as is, without us actively making things easier for them.
to Fully explain and analyze my findings in-depth, I will post all of them with evaluations and lines on my blog tomorrow, which has no posts as of late.
to Fully explain and analyze my findings in-depth, I will post all of them with evaluations and lines on my blog tomorrow, which has no posts as of late.
Why not just post them here in your forum?
Hey everyone! Here’s the link to my findings! https://www.chess.com/blog/HSCCNickS/my-three-new-openings-opening-systems
Hey everyone! Here’s the link to my findings! https://www.chess.com/blog/HSCCNickS/my-three-new-openings-opening-systems
they will post many different things to try to humilliate and upset you.
Take no notice of them
Your discoveries are amazing
just as you are
Maybe I discovered a new gambit Thursday? It was winning,, but my opponent was not a master, but a decent clubplayer. https://www.chess.com/blog/DjonniDerevnja/a-game-testing-ideas-getting-answers-but-they-were-unclear-cluchampionship-round-9
is an already well-known "refutation" to a scholars mate attempt, black has already equalized, perhaps even gained a small edge
You cant discover new novelty unless you have stockfish on 256 /512 cores computer.
Scholar mate is played at too newbie level, and your response stop it but is not efficient. Why not setup 3400+ stockfish and listen to his advice. It is the best response by stockfish. Black stop scholar mate easily while he is developing all pieces efficiently in well placed positions..

im just wondering if casual users of chess.com can publish their own openings