Can you get better just by playing a lot?

Sort:
Avatar of Sidvano

Play, play, analyze et invenies occultum lapidem wink.png

Avatar of incorrectname

if you analyze it and find the mistakes

Avatar of universityofpawns
ilovesmetuna wrote:
on average, i know if you walk 10 minutes from where i live, you will in fact see 5 pubs in a row all semi-detached.

The Irish drink more per capita than any other nation....I give them credit, they even beat the Ruskys.

Avatar of universityofpawns

Actually, they used to drink the most.....things have changed, I guess....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_alcohol_consumption_per_capita

Avatar of Rocky64
robbie_1969 wrote:

Doing the rubiks cube is not the same as playing chess, its a false equivalence.

Actually it's a good analogy comparing Rubik's Cube to chess, as both are complicated games and to improve in either, it's much more effective to learn from experts than to work it out yourself. Of course Rubik's Cube and chess are not the same thing, but since analogies are, by definition, comparing different things, saying that they are not the same is hardly an argument against an analogy.. Also, claiming "false equivalence" doesn't work here, because chess is a more strategic and complex game than Rubik's Cube and so, if anything, DragonPhoenixSlayer's point that studying is needed to improve is even more pertinent in chess.

Avatar of WalangAlam

I remember the advice my friend gave me when we were in highschool: learn the basics, like opening principles, endgame fundamentals, having a plan, learning positional play, doing tactics, hire a coach or play constantly with someone highly rated even if you have to lose money ( betting game against hustlers); because he said once you become good you can have all the fun! Besides, how can you have fun when you lose a lot?

Avatar of Gitananda
Corbellino wrote:
I am rubbish at chess. Sub-1000 rating. I like most people am busy. I don't have a lot of time to study chess (though I do try sometimes). My question: can you get good (1600+) just by playing a lot and trial & error type learning? or do you NEED to study, find a mentor, etc.

There are plenty of people on chess.com and other sites that play a lot but never make much improvement. Finding the right balance between playing chess and studying is key I think.