Carlsen Anand match

Sort:
MarcoAKQ

I would like to point out two intersting themes, imho, for, maybe, future articles on chess.com

1) conflict between generations: as Aronian said, there is a huge difference in the way old and young players think about positions, and that's why Anand lost.

2) team: what's the role of team of seconds in such a big match? A good team can help a player to win even if he's weaker?!?