chess.com is corrupt

Sort:
Viznik

if you want to see actual improvemet in your chess game, dont play on this website

they are driven by money. the millions of dollars they make in monthly subscription isn't enough apparently. It's painfully obvious they have employed a new a tactic (this tactic has been used on this site for 1-2 years now) and that being, if you start playing well and improving fastly, chess.com will start pairing you up against obvious smurfs. Accounts that are way higher rated than what they say they are. Either because they created a new account, or they are bored and enjoy beating up on newbs because they cant progress at their own level.

You will notice this happens every time you hit a milestone, almost on the dot. Just reached 1400? Prepare to play the nastiest, best 1400's you've ever seen. Hint: It's because they're smurfs that are really 1800+

Why does chess.com do this you ask? For money. You see, if you improve too fast on your own, you won't need to buy a chess.com premium membership and pay them for their puzzles and lessons and drills. 

Tilting = good for chess.com, because it means you're not good enough to improve on your own without their paid services.


As someone who has had diamond membership and gave out countless premium memberships to my members at Beginners & Masters and my friends, I can tell you first-hand the premium memberships do nothing for your game. There's tons of other websites that give you free puzzles. Even then, puzzles play minimal (if any) role in your chess progression. Most GM's agree puzzles are just for fun and don't actually apply to real games and your chess improvement. I suppose, if you're just starting it helps you understand how the pieces move, but other than that...

long story short, chess.com continues to be greedy and money-grubbing corrupt snots who want to see you fail so you pay them money.

Jalex13
Okay then….
TheSwissPhoenix

*laughs after increasing 250 points in a week* for bullet I doubt it smh

Viznik
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:

*laughs after increasing 250 points in a week* for bullet I doubt it smh

ive increased hundreds of points, doesnt mean @martin_stahl isnt trying his damndest to stop it

Chess_Player_lol

alternatively you played a few great games and got your rating higher than what you actually are, and now that you are done playing great, you are in a pool of players who are stronger than what you are used to. 

This conspiracy is probably the dumbest thing ive heard.

Viznik
Chess_Player_lol wrote:

alternatively you played a few great games and got your rating higher than what you actually are, and now that you are done playing great, you are in a pool of players who are stronger than what you are used to. 

This conspiracy is probably the dumbest thing ive heard.

this is obviously @martin_stahl's alt

 

i thought cc doesnt allow alt accounts? sad!

Jalex13
Oh well now we know you are an obvious troll. Accusing Martin smh 🤣
Chess_Player_lol

yah

BlueHen86
Viznik wrote:
Chess_Player_lol wrote:

alternatively you played a few great games and got your rating higher than what you actually are, and now that you are done playing great, you are in a pool of players who are stronger than what you are used to. 

This conspiracy is probably the dumbest thing ive heard.

this is obviously @martin_stahl's alt

 

i thought cc doesnt allow alt accounts? sad!

The problem is that you are a troll and troll's are notoriously inconsistent at chess.

Viznik
BlueHen86 wrote:
Viznik wrote:
Chess_Player_lol wrote:

alternatively you played a few great games and got your rating higher than what you actually are, and now that you are done playing great, you are in a pool of players who are stronger than what you are used to. 

This conspiracy is probably the dumbest thing ive heard.

this is obviously @martin_stahl's alt

 

i thought cc doesnt allow alt accounts? sad!

The problem is that you are a troll and troll's are notoriously inconsistent at chess.

>his highest rating is daily

>but im in the troll

 

lol ok

BlueHen86
Viznik wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
Viznik wrote:
Chess_Player_lol wrote:

alternatively you played a few great games and got your rating higher than what you actually are, and now that you are done playing great, you are in a pool of players who are stronger than what you are used to. 

This conspiracy is probably the dumbest thing ive heard.

this is obviously @martin_stahl's alt

 

i thought cc doesnt allow alt accounts? sad!

The problem is that you are a troll and troll's are notoriously inconsistent at chess.

>his highest rating is daily

>but im in the troll

 

lol ok

Glad you can laugh, being a troll must be lonely, it's good that you have a sense of humor.

Viznik

just played against another smurf because i was progressing too fast. cc is so corrupt its crazy

BlueHen86
Viznik wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
Viznik wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
Viznik wrote:
Chess_Player_lol wrote:

alternatively you played a few great games and got your rating higher than what you actually are, and now that you are done playing great, you are in a pool of players who are stronger than what you are used to. 

This conspiracy is probably the dumbest thing ive heard.

this is obviously @martin_stahl's alt

 

i thought cc doesnt allow alt accounts? sad!

The problem is that you are a troll and troll's are notoriously inconsistent at chess.

>his highest rating is daily

>but im in the troll

 

lol ok

Glad you can laugh, being a troll must be lonely, it's good that you have a sense of humor.

its not lonely, i have your mom

 

give by the 86 in your username its a given ur a boomer, so ur mom is probably dead, which is fine because ill just visit the graveyard

 

ayo?

You got one out of two, That's what I would expect from a troll, as I said, trolls are notoriously inconsistent.

Jalex13
People like you are so absurd, blaming cc for your playing fluctuatation
Nimzo-IndianaJones

Your troll posts are really lame. Grow up for once

WowThisIsWeird

Bruh Viz still that old troll huh

Why am I not surprised, ranting whenever something happens XD

would you like to remember you got me a diamond membership for a year

WowThisIsWeird
Jalex13 wrote:
People like you are so absurd, blaming cc for your playing fluctuatation

bruh can't you tell he's trolling

Kowarenai
Jalex13 wrote:
Oh well now we know you are an obvious troll. Accusing Martin smh 🤣

 

GM_chess_player
Viznik wrote:
Chess_Player_lol wrote:

alternatively you played a few great games and got your rating higher than what you actually are, and now that you are done playing great, you are in a pool of players who are stronger than what you are used to. 

This conspiracy is probably the dumbest thing ive heard.

this is obviously @martin_stahl's alt

 

i thought cc doesnt allow alt accounts? sad!

they allow alts, you didnt know? 

assassin3752

viznik just leave cc if you hate the site that much, you're a nuisance to everyone around you

This forum topic has been locked