I think it would be funner if I was better, but as crappy as I am, no.
Chess is not fun

There's a difference between fun and frivolious.
Something can be taken quite seriously and still be a source of enjoyment, which is part of the definition of 'fun.' But if one takes something seriously, it can't be enjoyed frivoliously by definition.

Going from 1200 - 1600 was a lot of fun.
Getting from 1700 - 1800 is now starting to feel like serious hard-work, and a lot of the things I saw as fun elements (easy tactics, quick mates, etc) are thin on the ground, so yes, from that perspective it is less fun in a lot of ways.

No, the more you learn and the better you get, the more fun you can have. I remember being shown the Benoni years ago by a guy at the Negaunee Chess Club in Michigan and I was like, I'd never play that. And what am I doing now...learning the Benoni! The better a player gets, the more appreciation he or she can have from the game.

At low level it was a game. At my level (for me my max limit) it's suffering and makes me not want to play chess
Perhaps an interlude of tiddlywinks may help until you can come back refreshed.

No, I don't think playing or learning chess is fun. At all. I am in that horrible phase where I only know the basics and have learned about the principles, but have not yet been able to implement them. Having never won a single game, I can honestly say that chess is no fun. I hope to change this.

if ratings 'don't' mean 'nothing', then they mean everything. grammar is important!
Actually, it just means that they 'do' mean 'something'.
Logic is a lot more important than grammar.

I think it's more fun when you are improving than when you are stuck at a plateau. The following plateaus are meant to exist which are hard to get past: 1500, 1900 (I was stuck there for ages but busted it eventually), 2200 and 2600 (not that any of us will get near this one).

if ratings 'don't' mean 'nothing', then they mean everything. grammar is important!
Actually, it just means that they 'do' mean 'something'.
Logic is a lot more important than grammar.
Personally I don't know nothing about anything.

No, I don't think playing or learning chess is fun. At all. I am in that horrible phase where I only know the basics and have learned about the principles, but have not yet been able to implement them. Having never won a single game, I can honestly say that chess is no fun. I hope to change this.
How's your coaching sessions going?

If your finding most of the chess you are playing a strain the solution is to play a separate type of chess purely for fun ? (Bltz for instance) I deliberately play some chess960 just for fun.

Netzach...me too. I am not a very high rated player (if you look at my score that is) but i love to change pace and 960 does that. Gives me a sort of equal stance at start like playing football in the rain. Or perhaps i just have high hopes.....
If chess ever stops being fun for me, I won't play any longer. What's the point if it isn't fun?