I have repeatedly pointed out the inaccuracies in what @tygxc has posted. I had thought that he took no notice and had become rather frustrated and said as much but, to his credit, he did accept a recent example (a discussion of the number of theoretical errors that could lead to 104 draws) ....
Don't count your chickens.
Can anyone find a post of @Optimissed that contains some substantial information about facts relating to the topic of discussion (solving chess) rather than willy-waving?